Is this the beginning of the end for Boris Johnson?

As Labour takes the lead in the opinion polls, the row over MPs’ second jobs has inflicted some damage on the prime minister

John Rentoul
Saturday 13 November 2021 15:11
<p>On top of everything else, Johnson failed to wear a mask on a hospital visit </p>

On top of everything else, Johnson failed to wear a mask on a hospital visit

Dominic Cummings walked out of 10 Downing Street a year ago, as the prime minister said he could hear the “toot of the bugle of the scientific cavalry” as, armed with vaccines, it came over the hill to rescue him. It was a chance for Boris Johnson to rebrand himself, which he seized with some success. With Cummings gone, he could restore relations with journalists, ministers, backbench Tory MPs and the civil service.

For most of the past year, Johnson has been living his best life, buoyed by vaccine euphoria in the opinion polls and chuntering on about “levelling up”. Meanwhile, all the attempts by his former chief adviser to destroy him, with colourful accounts of prime ministerial chaos in handling the early and middle phases of the pandemic, have left the target completely unmarked.

It is almost as if the prime minister has said: “If anyone is going to destroy me, I’ll do it myself.” Thus it was that he asked Conservative MPs to vote against the punishment of Owen Paterson for paid lobbying. As his majority collapsed from 80 to just 18, Johnson realised he had made a mistake, so he ordered a U-turn and demanded to know which fool had advised him that this was a clever thing to do.

Without an all-powerful adviser such as Cummings to take the blame, however, the buck stopped on Johnson’s desk, where it duly blew up, leaving the prime minister blinking through the soot like a cartoon character.

We have now reached the significant point in the evolution of public opinion known as “The Crossover”, where the polling averages switch from small Tory leads to small Labour ones. We shouldn’t exaggerate the effect of two weeks of daily headlines about the outside interests of Tory MPs. A lot of voters are not that interested, and for many people all it proves is that “they’re all the same”. It may also be that other issues are important: the state of the NHS, the prospect of a tax rise, and the visible arrival of people in small boats across the Channel.

Nor is level-pegging in opinion polls, two and a half years before the likely election in May 2024, something that a governing party should worry about unduly. But worry it will. There are two groups of people who are liable to overreact to The Crossover: Tory MPs and Labour MPs. Tory MPs are likely to panic, and some Labour MPs at least are likely to allow their contempt for Johnson to cloud their judgement.

Both groups tend to subscribe to the “sudden collapse” theory of the prime minister’s electoral base: they both think that Johnson is so disorganised and incompetent that, once things start to turn against him, he will make more mistakes and alienate more people until the walls start falling in on themselves.

It is an interpretation assiduously promoted by Cummings, who celebrated the anniversary of his departure by publishing a blog post explaining again the uselessness of “the trolley”, as he calls the prime minister. As ever with Cummings, it is a brilliant combination of insight and wishful thinking. He points out that Johnson’s threat in EU negotiations to suspend the Northern Ireland protocol is unlikely to work. He pours a justified bucket of cold water on the idea that it is all a cunning plan to “keep reviving Brexit to keep Labour off balance” – “we said we’d get Brexit done; the idea that arguing about Ireland is what key voters want to see is so dumb”. Which is interesting, because it seems like the kind of aggressive, disruptive tactic Cummings might have advocated – and because he knows David Frost, the Brexit negotiator, well.

Cummings also points out the hypocrisy of Johnson’s U-turn on MPs’ outside interests, now that the prime minister says it is “crucial” that MPs follow the rules, telling them to “put your job as an MP first and devote yourself primarily to your constituents”. He says that Johnson, after winning the election and before coronavirus struck, said he found the job of prime minister “like getting up every morning pulling a 747 down the runway” and wanted to “spend a lot of time writing my Shakespeare book”.

Apart from suggesting the origin of stories at the time about Johnson wanting to get on with his well-paid writing, I think this misreads the prime minister’s ability to switch moods – and indeed, whole personalities. As Cummings also says, when Johnson is in “self-aware” mode, fighting for his political survival, he is a different and more formidable politician.

To keep up to speed with all the latest opinions and comment sign up to our free weekly Voices Dispatches newsletter by clicking here

That is not the only reason for thinking that the “sudden collapse” theory is mistaken, however. I think Johnson’s electoral coalition is secure because it is built on the foundation of the new Brexit alignment. Cummings is right that the voters don’t want Brexit to be a permanent wrangle, but it is the reason a lot of new Tory supporters voted for Johnson in 2019, and there is nothing much that Labour can do to dislodge that new political identity.

It certainly isn’t something that the hoo-ha over MPs’ second jobs can achieve. Despite overheated comparisons to the expenses scandal of 2009, I don’t think that seven MPs are going to go to jail this time.

Johnson made a bad decision, probably motivated by a desire to weaken the standards commissioner, who might require him to abide by the rules designed to protect the integrity of public life. His decision triggered a storm of stories that have done some damage, even if it is not nearly as much as he deserved. I suspect that Dominic Cummings, Rishi Sunak and Keir Starmer will have to wait a while longer.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in