PMQs: Inequality is at its lowest since 1986 - and David Cameron takes the session with that

Labour conspired to hand Cameron the win this afternoon

David Cameron made a good defence of the Government's record, for once, at Prime Minister's Questions today. He was ably assisted by four supporters: Ed Miliband; John Cryer, the Labour MP for Leyton; David Winnick, the Labour MP for Walsall North; and John Bercow, the Speaker.

The Labour leader asked all his six questions about the NHS, a sure sign that he was on weak ground. It was noted, silently, that he didn't ask about the shipbuilding redundancies in Portsmouth. Jobs ought to be a Labour subject, but he chose the safety of the national religion.

However, his line of questioning was so formulaic that it had almost no effect, and Cameron, who was well briefed, held his own. I counted the clichés out and I counted them back in again. Miliband said that Cameron's attitude was, "Crisis? What crisis?" He said Cameron was "out of touch" and he concluded with a flourish by saying that the NHS was "not safe in his hands".

Cameron waited until after Miliband had finished and could not respond before he hit him with the Falkirk selection. The Prime Minister said that the leader of the opposition was "like the mayor of a Sicilian town: 'They put me in and I don't want them to take me out.'"

When John Cryer asked if the Prime Minister were damning people who were proud to be members of trade unions, Cameron easily paid his respects to trade union members before saying how sorry he was that they were "led so badly by bully boys", and accusing United of intimidating not just witnesses in Falkirk but the leader of the opposition.

At this point the Speaker decided to intervene yet again. Previously he had interrupted the Prime Minister to tell the backbenches off for making too much noise (I get "bucketfuls of letters" from the public about it, he said). This time he told asked Cameron to "remember the essence of the question".

So when David Winnick asked if the unfairnesses inflicted on a cowed and impoverished nation were what our forebears fought the Second World War for, Cameron replied with a long recitation of what his Government had done for the poor, pausing only to say, "I'm keen to answer the question, Mr Speaker."

The most startling of the Prime Minister's claims was that inequality is at its lowest level since 1986. This is absolutely true, and was published by the independent Office for National Statistics in its "The Effect of Taxes and Benefits on Household Income" in July. Disposable income was more equally distributed in the UK in 2011/12 than at any time since the great increase in inequality under Margaret Thatcher.

When Cameron went on to proclaim "pay day lending regulated for the first time", which is less true, the Labour benches squawked with indignation, but one suspected self-doubt.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in