Sri Lanka provides the argument for disbanding the Commonwealth

The country has no business hosting an event  meant to promote human rights

Murali Shanmugavelan
Tuesday 05 November 2013 15:16
Sri Lankan troops chase local residents protesting against the alleged poisoning of drinking water in the village of Weliweriya in August
Sri Lankan troops chase local residents protesting against the alleged poisoning of drinking water in the village of Weliweriya in August

Next week Sri Lanka will host Commonwealth Heads of Government Meet (CHOGM), apparently the first Asian country to host it in 24 years. According to its charter, the Commonwealth is committed to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other relevant human rights covenants and international instruments.

The host state, however, has abysmal records on human rights: military backed rape and killing, and the continued forced-disappearance of its own citizens even after the violent ending of 27 years of conflict when 40,000 civilians were murdered. Sri Lanka does not have any moral standing to host any event that is supposed to promote and restore human rights and democracy.

The United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Ms. Navi Pillai in her press conference in Colombo said that Liberation Tigers of Tamil Ealam (LTTE) was a murderous organisation and then expressed serious concerns about Sri Lankan government’s militarisation of civil zones in the name of post-war development; worried about the increased vulnerability of women and girls, especially female headed households to sexual harassment and abuse and the forced disappearance of many civilians not only in the North-East provinces and but also abductions in white vans in Colombo which will not fall within the scope of Commission of Inquiry on Disappearances.

Ms. Pillai also said, "more than 30 journalists are believed to have been killed since 2005, and several more – including the cartoonist Prageeth Ekneligoda – have disappeared."

The Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG) which is responsible for the restoration of democracy, human rights and constitutional rule of its member-states, has turned a blind eye to Sri Lanka’s horrible human rights violations, despite comprehensive evidence mounting from UN and from the media.

Understandably, human rights groups around the world and sympathisers particularly from India (home to 70 million Tamil population) have raised strong objections. The Tamil Nadu State Assembly recently passed a resolution demanding that India completely boycott CHOGM.

Indian foreign policy is not critical of its neighbouring state and it does not exactly have a stellar record of restoring human rights in its own country when it comes to issues related to Kashmir and Maoists. India also wants to stay with Sri Lanka for geo-political reasons as the host-state has recently cosied up with China.

Australia is also keen to do business with Asian countries and not bothered with human rights issues to wreck its trade focus.

This means the business and politics of member-states are hardly influenced by the so-called Charter of the Commonwealth even though a sizeable population of Sri Lankan Tamils have resettled into some of these member-countries as refugees. Neither member-states nor the CMAG take the charter seriously, except in select situations when African members were taken to task to wash the empire’s colonial guilt.

So far, Canada is the only country that has officially boycotted and its Prime Minister Stephen Harper questioned the relevance of the Commonwealth if a member-state like Sri Lanka continues to violate human rights.

The Commonwealth’s human rights wing, Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, has consistently counselled the Secretary General against allowing the CHOGM to be hosted by Sri Lanka. Its latest press release expressed "continued concerns regarding the holding of the CHOGM...and the fact that Sri Lanka will take over as the Chair of the Commonwealth of the next two years."

With this, the Commonwealth loses its moral right to exist. To allow a rogue state like Sri Lanka to enjoy a dubious legitimacy through a dubious endorsement only pushes the point home.

More on this here:

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in