John Kampfner: Walk on by– but don't ban the chuggers

I fall into the classic grump category - professional men of a certain age

There I was, coming out of the Tube and walking down the road, when I was accosted … The litany of complaints about "chuggers" – the young band of street fund-raisers – has reached the point where one might be forgiven for thinking these brightly-clad students were a grave threat to public order.

Chugging is the most "in yer face" means of collecting money for development, environmental and other charities. It can be, and for anyone in a hurry invariably is, incredibly annoying. Only last week I was approached by a young woman who side-skipped half a dozen paces to tell me what a nice person I was. This statement was so unlikely to be true that I harrumphed and told her with a sideways tilt of my shoulder that I was far too busy to talk.

According to school-leavers and university summer-vacationers I know who have done this, I fall into the classic grump category – professional men of a certain age. The people most likely to give are other young people and mums with children (I gender stereotype advisedly). You are more likely to get a tolerant hearing in Greenford than in Green Park, where they are on their way to their hedge fund offices or auction houses.

It is no surprise that multinational charities, such as Oxfam, are reconsidering their relationship with the companies that run the schemes. Strict rules are supposed to be in place: you are not allowed to move more than two steps to approach someone; you are not supposed to flirt or touch or begin to criticise someone who marches on. If you have failed to sign anyone up, having been on your feet all day, the temptation to go too far is considerable.

The two issues that the charities should look at most are the proportion of money they accrue from such exercises and the potential damage to the message. The chuggers often have no idea who they are representing until they turn up for work. According to the Institute of Fundraising, which is leading the re-think, last year 865,000 people signed up for long-term giving – providing £130m for good causes. For sure, tighten the rules and monitor chuggers better (by that I don't mean a further descent into authoritarian policing), but does anyone but Mr Grump gain by a ban or draconian restrictions? I've had to run fundraising for two organisations – neither suited chugging. Most charities rely on a mix of high net worth individuals (how I abhor that phrase, but find myself using it), large foundations, donation boxes, email campaigns, word of mouth and more. It is a constant slog and easy to make mistakes. It is far easier, however, to walk on the other side, muttering and spluttering as you make your way into the coffee shop for your daily latte.

John Kampfner is author of 'Blair's Wars' and 'Freedom For Sale'.

Twitter: @johnkampfner

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in