Tehmina Kazi: Inconsistency in enforcing laws just breeds resentment

Comment

I would be completely against a total ban of the face veil because it would be huge infringement of civil liberties.

If a woman makes an independent decision based on the religious texts, then who are we to question that? When women make an independent choice to wear these garments we have to support their human right to make that choice.

But my colleagues and I at British Muslims for Secular Democracy do support the Council of Europe's recent resolution which said that if a woman was coerced into wearing full-face veils by a family or community member, then the perpetrators should be punished. I would also support the restriction of face veils in certain key public spaces such as banks, nurseries and airports.

I think what annoys many people is not that women are going round with their faces veiled, it's the inconsistency with which laws over what people can or can't wear are applied. For example, you can't go into a bank with a motorbike helmet. But I've heard of many examples where people have been forced to take off their helmet and join a queue behind a woman in a niqab who is not asked to remove her veil. That kind of inconsistency breeds resentment and plays right into the hands of far-right groups.

It is certainly true that we do need to challenge assumptions within the Muslim community that it is acceptable to force a woman to wear certain items of clothing. But you don't do that by enforcing a ban on all women wearing the niqab.

What France has done will simply segregate these women. If the only way they can go out into the public space and engage in civic life is by wearing a face veil and you then take that veil away from them, you will simply marginalise them. Surely that is not what France's lawmakers had intended?

When Philip Hollobone says he won't see anyone who comes to his constituency office wearing a full-face veil, he is disempowering these women. If they had a genuine concern that they wanted to put across to their MP how on earth are they going to do that now?

Fortunately, I don't think you would ever see such moves for a ban in Britain – there would be an uproar and quite rightly.

It's a slippery slope when you have legislation which decides what people can or can't wear. Ultimately, if we banned every single item of clothing that some people didn't like, there would not be much clothing left to chose from.

Tehmina Kazi is director of British Muslims for Secular Democracy

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in