Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

It's true that celebrities deserve none of your sympathy during the coronavirus pandemic. But they're not the worst ones

Remember these are just the spokespeople for the 1 per cent. Hopefully the fact that people are turning on them now shows a bigger change to come

Skylar Baker-Jordan
Tennessee
Tuesday 31 March 2020 21:09 BST
Comments
Does anyone really care how quarantine is impacting Kim Kardashian-West?
Does anyone really care how quarantine is impacting Kim Kardashian-West? (AFP via Getty Images)

This morning, Kim Kardashian-West — who, like President Trump, inherited wealth from her father but enjoys pretending to be “self-made” — went on The View to talk about how she’s coping in quarantine. I didn’t watch because, well, I don’t care what Kim Kardashian-West has to say, but judging from the response on Twitter, it went about as well as you’d expect.

Kardashian-West isn’t the only celebrity during the current pandemic to lay bare the gross inequities between the lifestyles of the rich and famous and those of us struggling to make ends meet. The singer Sam Smith had an early and emotional breakdown on the steps of their £12 million mansion. Pharrell Williams asked fans to donate to help buy personal protective equipment for healthcare workers and got dragged for not emptying his own deep pockets. Madonna waxed poetic about how terrible yet wonderful it is that this deadly virus is a great equalizer while bathing in actual rose petals (after singing a bizarre song about fried fish which I insist you watch because honestly, it’s the best MAD TV sketch there never was).

Folks on both the left and the right have long lamented “celebrity culture,” the vacuous glorification of wealth and excess. The myth of aspiration and meritocracy has long been a part of the American psyche. We follow our favourite celebrities on Instagram, “liking” their selfies in walk-in closets and marveling that their bathrooms are the size of our living rooms. We are a nation that worships matinee idols as though they’re golden calves.

Well, Moses just came down from the mountain. Rather than carrying stone tablets, though, he’s carrying coronavirus. The current pandemic has laid bare just how vapid and ultimately untenable celebrity culture — and by extension late capitalism, with its massive wealth inequality and maltreated proletariat — is. Celebrities are avatars through which we live vicariously, enjoying their wealth and luxuries by proxy and dreaming that perhaps one day we, too, could load up the truck and move to Beverly (Hills, that is).

However, as Amanda Hess writes for the New York Times, “the dream of class mobility dissipates when society locks down, the economy stalls, the death count mounts and everyone’s future is frozen inside their own crowded apartment or palatial mansion.” While it is true that (to paraphrase Madonna Antoinette) Covid-19 doesn’t care if you are rich or poor — as Tom Hanks, Prince Charles, and country singer Joe Diffie (who sadly passed away from the disease) show — it is exposing the gross inequalities inherent in our system. When movie stars and famous athletes can get coronavirus tests despite not showing symptoms while the rest of us are told not to call 911 even if they have difficulty breathing, the mask of upward mobility slips and the ugly truth is revealed.

Sam Smith is never going to have to worry about losing their job because the restaurant they work at closed. Kim Kardashian-West will not have to worry about putting food on the table while daycare is shuttered and she has nowhere to send her kids. Some of us (like me) don’t even have health insurance, which means we’re faced with the daunting question of whether to even bother seeking treatment should things get as bad as they very well might. No star-studded cover of Imagine — well-intentioned as it may be — will change that grim reality.

That doesn’t mean celebrities aren’t feeling the same mortal terror as the rest of us. It also doesn’t mean that they are the primary antagonists in the burgeoning class war. Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin — he who ushered in a massive tax cut for billionaires, enabling them to pay less in taxes than the working class — thinks Americans can live on $17 a day. Former Wells Fargo CEO Dick Kovacevich last week said we should reopen the economy and send the working classes back to work even though “some of them will get sick, some may even die”. Indeed, as Hess points out, most film stars and athletes and famous musicians — though incredibly wealthy — don’t come near the richest of the rich.

They are, as she correctly states, “the ones who are tasked with liaising with the general public,” — essentially, the spokespeople for the 1 per cent. That folks are turning on them now — tired of them complaining about self-distancing in their sprawling palaces while a record number of Americans file for unemployment — might be a sign of more interesting things to come. We may even be seeing the first defections from the bourgeoisie: comedian Fran Drescher is calling for a general strike while comrade Britney Spears is demanding the redistribution of wealth.

Maybe they’re just trying to save their own skins, or maybe they’ve decided to use their platforms to do more than moan about how hard it is to be rich in a plague. Either way, you love to see it. We often call our celebrity idols snacks, after all, and I have long been a proponent of eating the rich. With supermarket shelves empty, soon we may have no choice.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in