Debate: It is never appropriate to protest at a funeral, even Margaret Thatcher's

 

Independent Voices
Wednesday 17 April 2013 12:38
Comments
Pallbearers carry the coffin of Margaret Thatcher as it arrives to be laid at the Crypt Chapel of St Mary Undercroft in the Houses of Parliament
Pallbearers carry the coffin of Margaret Thatcher as it arrives to be laid at the Crypt Chapel of St Mary Undercroft in the Houses of Parliament

What's going on?

Protests were expected along the route of the ceremonial procession of Margaret Thatcher's funeral guard as the former Prime Minister is taken to St. Paul's Cathedral.

Police gave permission to demonstrators to turn their backs as the flag-draped coffin passes, while other protestors promised to make as much noise as possible to disrupt the solemn procession.

The bell of Big Ben will be silenced today in a mark of respect last given for the funeral of Sir Winston Churchill in 1965.

This comes on top of news that taxpayers will contribute to the £10m cost of the elaborate funeral.

Case for: Loutish

Even if you despised Margaret Thatcher's record in government, her funeral is not a good time to make your feelings known. We owe the dead respect, never more so than at this time. Ranting and raving would only be a publicity coup for Thatcherites. It would also no doubt appal many who share the sentiments expressed - but consider their expression at this time tasteless. Margaret Thatcher's family and children are in attendance. To them, it is a mother being laid to rest. This stage of mourning should never be interrupted.

Case against: Dignified

It would be ghoulish and immature to protest at a private funeral. But this is not a private funeral. Instead, it is a song and dance commissioned and co-ordinated by a Tory-led government keen to idolise one of their own. They have turned Mrs Thatcher's funeral into a public event, and protestors have the right to respond to it as such. Catcalling? Some might consider that inappropriate still, given the presence of Mrs Thatcher's family. But turning backs? That is a dignified and symbolically powerful response. It is vital that we don't allow this pseudo-beatification to go ahead in the spirit of consensus.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in