Editorial: Electioneering is not free speech
Even the most ardent critics of the European Court of Human Rights must acknowledge that its most recent verdict deserves a round of applause.
So much for the oft-repeated claim that the European Court of Human Rights routinely tramples on good old-fashioned common sense. Indeed, even the Strasbourg court’s most ardent critics must acknowledge that its most recent verdict deserves a round of applause.
After all, an animal rights campaign group was claiming that Britain’s blanket ban on political advertising constitutes a denial of free speech (out of pique at being blocked from screening a TV ad). Had the case been upheld, the consequences would not have been pretty. Britain would, in all likelihood, have become another America, swamped by prime-time political lobbying, our air waves held hostage by those with the deepest pockets. Animal Defenders International’s self-serving claim that yesterday was “a profoundly sad day for democracy” could hardly be more wrong. It was, in fact, quite the reverse.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies