The campaign against the Army's use of Snatch Land Rovers has been raging for several years now. And powerful voices in Parliament and the media have condemned the use of the lightly armoured vehicles to transport troops.
But it is Susan Smith, whose son was killed in a Snatch Land Rover in Iraq in 2005, who has done most to bring this deadly problem to the attention of the British public.
Yesterday, the High Court ruled in favour of Ms Smith's argument that there should be a judicial review into the Government's refusal to hold a public inquiry into the Army's use of the vehicles. This does not mean that an inquiry is inevitable, but it opens the door to one.
Ms Smith's campaign is an inspiring example of what one motivated individual can achieve in the face of official intransigence and denial. We can be confident that she will see this case through to the end, wherever it may lead.
Register for free to continue reading
Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism
By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists
Already have an account? sign in
Join our new commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies