Poll: Should biter striker Luis Suarez be allowed to stay on at Liverpool

Monday 22 April 2013 09:06 BST

A screen grab of Luis Suarez biting Chelsea defender Branislav Ivanovic

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Yesterday footballer Luis Suarez bit an opponent for the second time during his career.

He will face an internal club inquiry for the incident involving Chelsea defender Braislav Ivanovic, but speculation over Suarez's future is complicated by his excellent peformance in the match otherwise. He scored the match equaliser deep into added time.

Various sanctions are being discussed, including a 10-match ban. But should Suarez even be allowed to stay on at Liverpool given his record of violent behavoir?

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Poll: Should biter striker Luis Suarez be allowed to stay on at Liverpool

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering