Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LETTER: Court costs deplete legal aid fund

Mr A. J. Rylands
Thursday 09 February 1995 00:02 GMT
Comments

Sir: The item Another View (2 February) by Peter Berts QC, on the quotation of the costs of the Maxwell case, prompts me to mention a point that has so far gone unremarked.

The Lord Chancellor has issued a directive to the effect that where a legally aided defendant is acquitted, his costs are not to be paid, generally, by the prosecution. This is contrary to the general rule regarding awards of costs and, indeed, if a non-legally aided defendant is acquitted, he or she normally receives an award of costs against the prosecution.

The result of this is that if the Maxwell brothers are acquitted, the legal aid fund will still have to stand the expense of their defence. The legal aid fund, which will have been heavily depleted, will, in effect, have subsidised the unsuccessful operations of the SFO and Crown Prosecution Service.

Yours faithfully, A. J. Rylands Whitby, North Yorkshire 2 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in