Letter: Life assurance
Sir: The response from elements of the life-assurance industry to the Securities and Investments Board's proposal to broaden the constitution of self-regulatory boards by including non-industry representatives (14 January) is entirely predictable.
Self-regulation, in terms of the financial-services industry, has been a dismal failure and the incestuous make-up of regulatory boards and committees has been a major contributory factor. This attempt to police the life-assurance industry by its own practitioners has produced an environment that is characterised by cynicism, self-interest and a determination to maintain the status quo.
The long-suffering public would benefit enormously from the abandonment of self-regulation but, as an interim step, the breaking of the 'self-preservation society' syndrome would be welcome. It is to be hoped that the involvement and contribution of public-interest representatives would ensure that, for the first time, the life-assurance industry is forced to take account of what the public wants and to respond accordingly.
Yours faithfully,
S. M. KINNIS
Marketing Director
The Equitable Life Assurance Society
Aylesbury, Buckinghamshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments