Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

LETTER: Little lobsters

Georgina Hobhouse
Monday 05 February 1996 00:02 GMT
Comments

From Ms Georgina Hobhouse

Sir: Regarding Scott Hughes's examples of seemingly ridiculous rules and regulations emanating from Brussels (Section Two, 2 February), the catch and marketing of wild lobsters is indeed regulated with a minimum size. Far from being a "bizarre regulation" invented by Eurocrats, however, this is a measure designed not to protect the consumer, but to protect the lobster species.

The theory is that by ruling that nothing below the length of 85mm (this is not total length but the shell length of the main body) should be "landed", the fishery will be protected and small lobsters, which are normally caught alive and unharmed, can be returned to the sea to grow a little more and, hopefully, reproduce.

It is actually arguable that the minimum size of 85mm is not large enough, as it seems that very few female lobsters as small as that have actually yet produced eggs: the female carries her eggs for nearly a year, and in these waters I have never yet seen an undersize female lobster with "berries". In fact, at the moment many lobster fishermen on the west coast of Scotland are voluntarily adopting a minimum landing size of nearly 100mm.

Yours faithfully,

Georgina Hobhouse

Isle of Colonsay, Argyll

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in