Letter: No smoke without taxes - the case against prohibition

Friday 23 May 1997 23:02 BST

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The estimated revenue from tobacco sales in the current financial year is pounds 9.5bn. For the same period, the Health Education Authority estimates the cost of treating "smoking-related illnesses" at pounds 345m. A recent article in your newspaper stated that the budget for research into all forms of cancer was pounds l5m a year.

Smokers are subsidising non-smokers to the tune of rather over pounds 9bn a year. One wonders just how many times over we are expected to pay for medical treatment.

DAVID J ANDERSON

Wakefield, West Yorkshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Letter: No smoke without taxes - the case against prohibition

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering