Letter: President Bush and the Clinton file

Mr James Rusbridger
Wednesday 09 December 1992 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The files inspected by the Home Office concerning President-elect Bill Clinton during his stay in Britain in the Sixties, (report, 7 December) were those prepared jointly by GCHQ (aided by MI5), and the National Security Agency (NSA) during their illegal surveillance operation, called 'Shamrock', which began in 1969 in the UK. This had been secretly authorised by President Nixon against anti-Vietnam war demonstrators in foreign countries, while a similar CIA/NSA operation called 'Minaret' targeted people in the United States.

Both operations involved the unauthorised tapping of domestic and international communications, and opening the mail of those openly critical of US involvement in Vietnam. The two projects came to an abrupt end when their existence was exposed on 7 June 1973 and, in order to save Nixon, the CIA, and the NSA public embarrassment, the US government forced the Justice Department to abandon its investigation.

One person who knew all about this unauthorised operation was President Bush, previously a director of the CIA, so it is not surprising his campaign's request for smear information about Mr Clinton was readily processed by a pro-Bush British government.

Yours faithfully,

JAMES RUSBRIDGER

Bodmin, Cornwall

7 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in