Letter: Private remedy for shingles pain

Dr Tim Swanwick
Saturday 17 April 1993 23:02 BST
Comments

'CUTS 'curb shingles drug' ', was a misleading and ill-informed piece.

Acyclovir has been around since the early 1980s and its indiscriminate use was warned against from the outset. Trials of the drug have shown that its benefits are marginal; with its use there is no reduction in the frequency and severity of long-term post-shingles pain and no decrease in the quantity of painkillers taken by those treated with the drug. Acyclovir continues to be recommended in opthalmic shingles and first attack genital herpes.

The Consumers' Association's widely circulated Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin concluded last December that the minor benefits are 'not enough to justify use of acyclovir in patients who are otherwise well'.

In the case of acyclovir, the decision not to prescribe is a responsible action based on the available scientific evidence and was taken in the best interests of both the patient and the NHS. There are plenty of arguments against the fund-holding system but this is not one of them.

Dr Tim Swanwick

Vine House Health Centre

Abbots Langley, Herts

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in