Letter : Shipyard never said 'unsinkable'

John Kelly
Sunday 01 September 1996 23:02 BST
Comments

Sir: In regard to Geoffrey Hodgson's article on the Titanic ("Graves, the new destination", 31 August), it is worth noting that the claim that the Titanic was unsinkable came not from Harland and Wolff in Belfast (the designer and builder) or the White Star Line (the owner), but from the press of the day. The ship was described as "practically unsinkable" in a newspaper article.

It was, however, well known in Harland that if a certain number of the bulkheads were breached, the ship would go down.

The lack of lifeboats was due to standard safety practice of the time, not because anyone thought the ship could not sink. The number of lifeboats reflected the number of first- and second-class passengers the ship could carry. Most who went down with the Titanic were steerage.

JOHN KELLY

Gortnacally,

Co Fermanagh

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in