Sir: It's worrying that J M Murphy (letter, 1 February) evokes that old chestnut, the "taxpayer" argument, to justify misgivings over the A30 protesters.
All Swampy and colleagues did was to exercise their right in a democratic society to freedom of speech.
The sinister but logical extension of the Murphy view is that we, as taxpayers, should not support any form of protest - for example by funding the policing of marches.
Freedom of speech is use-dependent: we either use it or lose it.
If the Murphy view is upheld, it will be lost, and we'll all end up doing what we're told.
TIM CHEEK
Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments