LETTER: The CIA made a killing on modern art

Sunday 29 October 1995 00:02 GMT

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

I FIND it strange that your article, "Modern art was CIA 'weapon' " (22 October), did not suggest that the "Cold War" justification for the CIA's support for American "abstract expressionist" art could easily have served as a convenient cover for the aim of increasing the financial value of the paintings.

After all, members of that wealthy class of Americans whose influence in the US government was most manifested in the CIA, not to mention CIA personnel themselves, were investors. Are we to believe that such an increase in value was merely a fortuitous and unintended side-effect of an altruistic effort to promote "the American way"?

R Maltz

London N8

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

LETTER: The CIA made a killing on modern art

Join our commenting forum

Thank you for registering