Letters: Why the country voted Tory

These letters appear in the 11th May issue of The Independent

Independent Voices
Sunday 10 May 2015 19:14

I am amazed that in your editorial of 9 May you write: “Mr Cameron’s ... success is turbo-charged by it being so unexpected and so associated with him personally.”

I had a conversation on election day with a young care worker, someone you would imagine might be a Labour supporter. She told me she had voted Conservative and when I asked why explained that she and her partner were trying to save for their own home, however long it took.

She said her partner’s family were all on benefits, but he wanted to better himself and had found a job, and together they were working hard for their future. She said that she had voted for a party that would encourage people to do what they were doing and not simply hand out endless benefits.

She did not mention David Cameron once.

Gillian Cook


I believe a big thank-you should go out from the Tory party to the programme commissioners of such shows as Benefit Street and The Jeremy Kyle Show for revealing to voters why £12bn worth of welfare cuts are needed to keep on top of these “undeserving poor”.

Another round of applause from the Tories should be aimed towards the Labour leaders for producing such an inept attempt at an election campaign. Thanks to them the poor, disabled and disadvantaged now have to face the onslaught of another five years of the cruellest class-based government in living memory, while the population at large is faced with the growing pavement cry of “Any spare change, please?”

Frank Kenny


The broadcasters responsible for the TV debates bear some responsibility for Labour’s defeat.

By giving Nicola Sturgeon such prominence, they made the SNP an election issue for English voters and enabled the Conservatives to scaremonger about the nightmare of a Labour-SNP coalition. The TV debates created the Sturgeon tsunami which helped to wash away Labour in both England and Scotland.

Giselle Green

London NW6

For the ninth UK general election in a row the clear winner is ... Rupert Murdoch.

Paul Clein


Labour must retake the centre ground

David Cameron, after five years of being Prime Minister in a coalition, finally managed to live down the fact that he is not Kenneth Clarke.

Elections are won from the centre. By successfully labelling everyone else as extreme David Cameron won the swing this rickety old election system of ours needed to deliver him a majority in the Commons.

The main lesson for the Labour Party of the Blair years is clear and unmistakable. Blair won three election victories for Labour by establishing himself and them on the centre ground. Unless Labour does that again they will remain out of office.

Nigel F Boddy


Don’t forget the national debt

Various parties in this election as well as 9 May’s edition of your paper have been full of talk about the need for progressive politics and an end to austerity. Today the net national debt of the United Kingdom stands at just above 80 per cent of GDP; in 2008, before the onset of the financial crisis, it stood at just below 40 per cent, and for years before that it stood a few points above or below that line.

There is nothing progressive about a politics that does not engage the electorate with the seriousness of the United Kingdom’s national debt. That this did not happen goes some way to explain why this country now has a Conservative majority government.

Jeremy Sheldon

Dorking, Surrey

Now to reform council tax

Let’s rejoice at the stillbirth of the nonsensical mansion tax. Nevertheless, all is not well with the council tax. It has been 24 years since properties were valued. It is also far too regressive. The answer is more bands.

More bands and a revaluation merely redistribute the council tax burden with, in all likelihood, there being more winners than losers. It also happens to conform with David Cameron’s professed “one-nation” Conservatism.

Yugo Kovach

Winterborne Houghton, Dorset

Smaller parties left feeling cheated

The SNP and the Lib Dems between them have polled under three million votes and have achieved 64 seats. The Greens and Ukip have polled over five million votes and have achieved two seats.

How does this make voting worthwhile, or fair, or democratic, and is there any wonder that voters are left feeling disenfranchised?

What is needed most is a change in the system of voting.

Peter Webb

West Byfleet, Surrey

Taxation without representation

Cristiano Bianchi laments not being able to vote in the general election (letter, 8 May). Welcome to the club, Cristiano.

The same holds for UK nationals who live in continental Europe. They are not able to vote where they pay taxes.

Terence Hollingworth

Blagnac, France

Lib Dems pay the price of the Coalition

Sean O’Grady (“Ah, Nick, you could have been a contender”, 9 May) paints a picture of what might have been if after the 2010 election the Liberal Democrats had remained in opposition, supporting the Tories only when appropriate.

He seems to ignore two things. The first is the positive things that the Coalition gave to this country entirely as a result of the Lib Dems. These include the rise in the lower tax threshold, giving £800 to many people, although not the rich; making sure that pensions will rise at least 2.5 per cent per year; introducing 1.6 million apprenticeships since 2010; tackling climate change and creating 200,000 new jobs by investing in renewable energy; creating the first green investment bank; providing free school meals for all Year 1 and 2 children. None of these crucial changes would have occurred without the Lib Dems being in government.

The second is that, at the start of the last parliament, there was no need for the Conservatives to serve the full term, and they could have called an election at any time. If the Liberal Democrats had voted against the much deeper cuts the Conservatives proposed or measures such as the right of bosses to fire people for no reason, the Tories would have called an election, which almost certainly would have given them increased support and would have decimated the Liberal Democrats for bringing down the Government. We would then have been where we are now but without the raised threshold for tax, the pensions lock, etc. Nick Clegg was right to go into the Coalition, and we shall see now what it might have been like if he had not.

David Cole-Hamilton

St Andrews, Fife

“What immortal hand or eye dare frame thy fearful symmetry?” Blake’s words provide a haunting epitaph for post-war liberals.

In 1950 the party nationally won nine seats and lost well over 300 deposits. For two-thirds of a century I wasted uncountable hours and cash helping to bring the party up to 59 seats. Then to my horror, ignoring the ghastly warning of the 1924 election, they plunged into a coalition supporting totally illiberal policies.

The idea of cutting income tax across the board when faced with a deficit so that it was replaced with more VAT, hitting the poorest, must be the most stupid policy ever laid before the British electorate.

Among other outrages such as the bedroom tax and benefit sanctions, the party acquiesced in an attack on welfare to finance tax cuts and help those who already have money, making the deficit worse, while food banks grew and life expectancy varied from 62 years to 81 between poor and rich areas.

Then they claimed they had done a good job. Voters, wisely, did not agree.

In 1924 the Liberals lost 73 per cent of their MPs. This time it was 84 per cent but the fearful symmetry is with 1950. This year once again over 300 deposits were lost and one less MP was elected. Unlike in 1950, they did not even have the wit to insure them at Lloyd’s.

Derek J Cole


Now that the Lib Dems are again an opposition party, a good way to lose the stain of supposed untrustworthiness will be to choose as leader an MP who actually voted against tuition fees. The name of that person is Tim Farron.

Anthony Batchelor

Bromyard, Herefordshire

How ironic that in punishing the Liberal Democrats for allying with the Conservatives the electorate has landed us with a stronger Conservative government.

Peter Forster

London N4

The TV debates created the Sturgeon tsunami which helped to wash away Labour in both England and Scotland

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in