The UK will soon reap what it has sown amid the Windrush generation scandal

Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Sunday 22 April 2018 15:19
Comments
David Gauke says he feels ashamed for what has happened with the Windrush scandal

The disgraceful treatment of the Windrush generation is not some aberration that has been thrown up from the bowels of the Home Office, as some seem to think. It is symptomatic of the anti-migrant attitude that has grown over recent years. The “hostile environment” policy of the Home Office typifies the attitude to migrants, particularly since the Brexit vote. And the country is already beginning to reap what it has sown, with fewer and fewer migrants prepared to take their chances in that hostile environment. The UK will pay the price, with its ageing population and creaking public services that are in the main kept going by migrant labour. If this continues, the only ones getting their country back will be the fascists.

Patrick Donovan
London

Windrush citizens’ treatment exemplifies Kafka’s nightmare, in which one is judged by the Home Office in terms of classification, hierarchy and deferment of responsibility. One’s complaint reveals that the “necessary documents” are lost or claims to long-term citizenship officiously, bureaucratically challenged; every “expert” is inexpert at satisfying justice. Officials are pompous and pedantic and what we presume to be a “rational process” is irrational, racist and pointless. It’s there in Kafka’s The Trial.

Mike Bor
London

Keep up the good work, Shappi

Shappi Korsandi’s brilliant article on immigration and racism in Britain is one of the strongest I have ever read on the subject. It shines a bright, clear light on the evil involved and deserves to be published far and wide in the fight against the wicked treatment being meted out to people who, as far as I am concerned, are decent, upright, hardworking, British people.

Patrick Wise
Cirencester

Opelo Kgari’s story is harrowing, but not unique

I have just read Opelo Kgari’s harrowing account of the Home Office’s attempt to deport her. I don’t know the details of the case for her removal so I can’t comment on that. However, what concerns me is her treatment at the hands of her “captors”. What right does anyone have to bodily search someone else when no crime has been committed or even suspected, especially when the search leaves the victim feeling robbed of her dignity? And what right does anyone have to take away someone else’s legally acquired mobile phone (or other personal property) and prevent that person from talking to whoever she wants to? Why could Opelo not spend her time in transit talking to her friends?

Even if Opelo’s mother brought her to the UK illegally, as a child she was not guilty of doing anything wrong. The Home Office should ensure her human rights are not breached. Sadly, we know Opelo and her mother are far from unique in their experience of attempted deportation.

Joe Hennessy
Faversham

Time for Prince Charles to pay for his gaffes

The former footballer and now standup comedian Paul Gascoigne was fined £1,000 for joking to a black security officer, “smile please, because I can’t see you”. When a black woman told Prince Charles she was from Manchester, he replied, “You don’t look like it”. Can we look forward to the Prince’s collar being felt by the local plod with a view to a suitable fine being imposed on his royal not-so-highness?

Sam Boote
Nottingham

The pension gap for women like me is wider than you think

As a woman born in October 1953, I agreed to pay full NI contributions for 40 years in order to qualify for a full state pension at age 60. I have kept my side of the bargain; in fact I have paid 43 years of full NI contributions.

I am now aged 64 and will finally be able to claim my pension from July this year. I now discover that I will not get a full state pension after all. Amid all the other changes to rules which have been retrospectively applied was one I missed.

I have two occupational pensions from my working life which did honour our agreement and, combined with my husband’s pension, enabled me to retire at 62. This means that I have not paid NI contributions since 2015. The changes to the rules in 2016 say that only 30 of my 43 years count and as I haven’t paid contributions from 2016 onwards I no longer qualify for a full state pension. I can buy extra years’ of contributions but my 13 years of overpayment don’t qualify.

I understand that the country cannot afford to pay pensions at the current rate but to penalise people who are of the generation that have worked hard all their lives is callous and mean.

Julia Hatch
Penzance

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in