The Independent's journalism is supported by our readers. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn commission.

London Zoo's annual weighing of its animals could be a huge help to conservation in the wild

Gathering this type of information is incredibly challenging in the wild, so many species are never classified, making them more vulnerable to climate change, habitat loss and other threats

Tara Pirie
Monday 27 August 2018 14:45 BST
By weighing animals you immediately have something concrete that can be used to evaluate wellbeing and review the effectiveness of conservation methods
By weighing animals you immediately have something concrete that can be used to evaluate wellbeing and review the effectiveness of conservation methods

Every August, London Zoo weighs and measures every one of its 19,000 animals. It’s a great PR move for the zoo, guaranteeing lots of friendly coverage of photogenic animals on scales or next to tape measures, at a time when many politicians and journalists have clocked off for the summer.

But, as a wildlife conservation researcher and a former zookeeper, I have seen exactly how these sorts of annual “weigh-ins” also helped the animals themselves. Recording the weights and size of animals in a zoo directly benefits their welfare, and could potentially help in the global conservation of their wild counterparts.

Monitoring the health of the animals in your charge is a large part of what being a keeper is all about. You do this by getting to know the individuals and noting any changes in their behaviour each day as you would your own pet. You even assess their droppings, looking at colour and solidity – which made for interesting conversation on morning coffee breaks.

Although these observations are useful, they can be a bit subjective. By taking measurements such as weight you immediately have something a bit more concrete that can be used to evaluate wellbeing and review the effectiveness of husbandry methods. Also, giving the correct dosage of food supplements or medicines often requires you to know the weight of an animal.

Lion devours wild heron in front of shocked visitors, after bird landed in zoo

Small creatures such as snakes or lizards can be put into a pillow case and weighed using hanging scales. A trained handler can even hold a venomous snake species such as a black mamba against a tape measure.

However, larger mammals are a bit trickier. Whether it is a lemur or rhino, it often involves time, effort and patience to train one to walk onto a set of scales. Usually there is some form of food reward to help entice them onto the scales in the first place and then to keep them stationary long enough for a reading. For the most dangerous mammals of all, such as the African leopards I worked with, zookeepers have to either target train them with food (using a stick with meat on the end) or wait until there is a reason to sedate them, then weigh them.

If you think this sounds difficult, it is nothing compared to the challenges faced out in the wild. There, this kind of information is usually only gathered when the species is specifically being studied and only then typically when the animal is under sedation for research purposes (for instance, to fit a GPS tracking collar).

Often the species that are being studied have been officially assessed as threatened with extinction, based on population numbers and trends, types of threat and conservation effort. Although populations need to be monitored directly over time to check for increases or decreases, they can also be modelled based on basic information such as weight, life expectancy and breeding rates to give an idea of what the population is likely to do under different circumstances.

In the region of 25 per cent of known animals have been classified, however for all taxa (mammals, reptiles, birds and so on) there are species that have not been classified due to insufficient data. Many of these fall into the less “charismatic” categories such as amphibians, crustaceans or fish. For example, it is thought 23 per cent of assessed amphibians have not been classified, while up to half of amphibian species are potentially threatened with extinction. There are even gaps in our knowledge of mammals, 14 per cent of which have not been classified.

How can scientists fill in those gaps? I attended a conference recently where a speaker was discussing the potential for utilising the data gathered by zoos to produce models for the species with missing data and assess how vulnerable they might be to climate change, habitat loss and other threats.

And zoos have a lot of data: of all the thousands of threatened land vertebrate species – everything from tigers or lemurs to colourful snakes or tiny frogs – around one in seven have some individuals held in captivity somewhere. Zoos really can fill an important role and have an impact.

This knowledge in turn could then be used to highlight where conservation efforts and often limited funding should be focused, to increase the survival chances of more threatened species out in the wild.

Tara Pirie is a postdoctoral researcher with People and Wildlife Research Group at the University of Reading. This article originally appeared in The Coversation

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in