The backlash against detaining a terror suspect in Manchester under the Mental Health Act is naive and wrong

The Mental Health Act exists to protect the public, but also perpetrators who may not have been in control of their actions when they committed a crime. That doesn’t mean we’re seeing a conspiracy

Caitlin Morrison
Wednesday 02 January 2019 17:42 GMT
Comments
Moment man arrested after ‘knife attack’ at Manchester railway station

News that the suspected perpetrator of a terror attack in Manchester has been detained under the Mental Health Act has unsurprisingly caused a Twitter storm.

Three people were injured in the knife attack which took place at Victoria Station in the city on New Year’s Eve. A 25-year-old man was arrested for attempted murder at the scene, and police confirmed on Tuesday that they were treating it as a terror incident.

Understandably, any suspected terror attack creates heightened fears and tensions in the community, and this was no different. But the backlash after the suspect was detained has been particularly strong.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in