Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Of course Shamima Begum should get legal aid – Channel 4's Derry Girls helps explain why

Snide comments from Jeremy Hunt may appease the Tory faithful, but they don’t help get to grips with what happened and why

Jonathan Cooper
Monday 15 April 2019 14:14 BST
Comments
Jeremy Hunt defends Shamima Begum receiving legal aid

As we squirm with joy at Channel Four’s Derry Girls, Muriel Spark’s brilliant novel, The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie comes to mind. Spark brings to life a gaggle of girls, the “Brodie set”, all of whom have fallen under the spell of their teacher. The troubled Derry in the nineties is replaced by 1930s Edinburgh with the Spanish Civil War providing the backdrop.

As with the Derry Girls, religion bumps along with political tensions in the Brodie set’s world. The genius of both is how they capture the headstrong spirit of adolescent girls who remain children at heart. The parallels with Shamima Begum are obvious.

Carefully knitted into Spark’s storyline is the plight of Joyce Emily Hammond. Girls can be cruel. The Brodie set don’t allow Joyce to join their gang, but she remains bewitched by Brodie. The most gutting moment of the book is when we hear the news that Joyce has been killed in Spain. Inspired by Brodie’s fascism, the teenager runs off to Spain to fight. She’s collateral damage for Franco’s forces, but ultimately she dies for Brodie.

That story seems very familiar. Now we are struggling with the aftermath of a deluded teenager scurrying off to join up in her very own Spanish Civil War, albeit this time in Syria, fighting for the wrong side. To the extent that Shamima is still alive, she’s lucky. She’s been spared the fate of Joyce, but she’s experienced stuff and done things that teenagers should not.

War is barbaric. It’s why international human rights law won’t allow people under 18 – children – to fight. Their youth and innocence should be protected. They’re easy to exploit. We know child soldiers are capable of committing the most heinous war crimes. Children’s brains aren’t capable of processing reality in the way that adults’ can.

Shamima’s remarkable admissions in her interview with the journalist who discovered her were a revelation. It confirmed what child rights specialists know. Because of the nature of childhood, young people must be spared the reality of war.

Instead of allowing Shamima to return to the UK, she is instead denied her UK citizenship. Today it has been disclosed that she will receive legal aid to challenge that decision. On the BBC Radio 4’s Today programme the foreign secretary, Jeremy Hunt, fell into the trap of saying he was personally “disappointed” by the decision to grant her legal aid. By expressing this opinion, Hunt gratuitously politicised Shamima’s circumstances. When will the government learn that they must not undermine justice?

The denial of citizenship is too serious for the foreign secretary to be expressing his off-the-cuff view. Inevitably, Shamima will win her case. Citizenship is fundamental. There have to be exceptional reasons to remove it. Shamima has known no other citizenship than British. Because citizenship is so core to social identity, human rights law defends it robustly. It goes without saying that if Shamima is eligible for legal aid, when faced with the loss of her identity, legal aid will be granted.

The fact that Shamima may technically not become stateless because she may have some claim to Bangladeshi citizenship through her grandparents misses the point.

Shamima is British. Going off to join Islamist extremists in Syria makes her no less British than Joyce going off to fight with the fascists in Spain. Amongst the responses to the dilemma that Shamima, and people like her, pose for the British government, denying her citizenship should not be one of them. As this will almost certainly be a denial of Shamima’s rights it is irresponsible of the Home Secretary to take this course of action. It is playing politics with human rights. He will know that.

In Spark’s novel, Brodie eventually gets her comeuppance, but no one is held to be complicit in Joyce’s death.

Without accountability, there’s a risk that lessons aren’t learnt, and that history repeats itself. Visionary leadership should be much more concerned to find out how Shamima was radicalised and what led her to support the wrong side.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Instead of hounding a teenage girl, the British state should be pursuing those who manipulated her. The British authorities should also be asking what more they could have done to protect Shamima. Snide comments may appease the Tory faithful, but they don’t help get to grips with what happened and why.

At around the same time that Channel 4 was regaling us with Derry Girls, the BBC screened Border Country, about living on the UK/Irish border during the Troubles. A woman discusses how as a teenager she’d joined the IRA. Her journey was a powerful one of reconciliation. It was a story of forgiveness and being forgiven. Shamima should be held to account for her actions, but she is entitled to no less and no more than any other British citizen.

Jonathan Cooper is a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers and a human rights specialist with experience before English and International courts.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in