By strolling into the DMZ with Kim, has Donald Trump saddled us with a nuclear North Korea?

In return for giving the president his holiday snaps, North Korea may say goodbye to some US sanctions without giving up its programme

Scott Lucas
Monday 01 July 2019 16:03
Trump becomes first sitting US president to set foot in North Korea at meeting with Kim Jong-un

They came. They shook hands. Then one of them retreated

Donald Trump has secured his latest photo opportunity with his “good friend”, North Korean leader Kim Jong-un. He can say that he is the first US president to take a step – 20 of them in fact – inside North Korea.

But beyond the headline pictures of two smiling leaders, at least one of them authoritarian, sharper analysts were asking if there was any substance to a meeting which follows two summits that failed to make any progress on long-standing political, military, and economic issues.

This morning, we have our answer: as Trump sent his Twitter invitation to Kim on Saturday, his officials – unaware that the impulsive tweet was being sent – are planning to retreat from the administration’s position of full “denuclearisation” of North Korea.

The historic June 2018 summit in Singapore yielded only a vague statement on a nuclear-free Korean Peninsula, and February’s meetings in Vietnam ended with a dramatic walkout by Kim. So weeks before Trump’s trip to the G20 summit in Osaka and his planned stopover in the demilitarised zone, the advisors have been working on the basis of a “nuclear freeze” by North Korea.

Pyongyang will retain all of its nuclear weapons – with estimates ranging from 20 to 60 – and there will be no restrictions on its missile capability.

In effect, Trump’s advisors are taking up a February offer of Kim’s that was rejected by Trump, leading to the North Korean leader’s sudden departure from the summit.

Kim offered to give up the nuclear fuel production site at Yongbyon, in return for the lifting of the strictest US sanctions. Trump, advised by secretary of state Mike Pompeo and his national security advisor John Bolton, rejected the proposal because North Korea has other production sites besides Yongbyon.

US officials are now hoping that they can persuade North Korea to expand the Yongbyon offer to include other facilities, such as the nearby covert site at Kangson.

But a “senior US official involved in North Korean policy” has said there is no way to know if North Korea will agree to a freeze. He noted the insistence of Pyongyang’s negotiators that only Kim can define the dismantling of Yongbyon to include a change in status of other facilities.

Trump’s photo opportunity complicates the planning. As he praised Kim, Trump could not even answer with whom the US will be talking, amid rumours that the North Korean leader detained and even executed his top negotiators after the February debacle in Vietnam, before declaring, “I know who the head is.”

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Trump did not refer to denuclearisation, a nuclear freeze, or any other substantial matter in the appearance with his good friend. All we can grasp hold of was his vague declaration before the journey to the demilitarised zone:

“It’s just a step. It might be an important step or it might not. There’s a good feeling, so it could be very good. As far as another meeting, let’s see what happens today before we start thinking about that.”

So as Trump hangs the photos on his wall, we are left in limbo. Up to last weekend, the administration’s public line, stated by Pompeo, was that “rapid denuclearisation of North Korea [must] be completed by January 2021″.

In 2017, during a visit to South Korea, then secretary of state Rex Tillerson rejected the nuclear freeze option because it would “leave North Korea with significant capabilities that would represent a true threat, not just to the region, but to American forces as well.”

Is the Trump administration really turning back the clock to 1994 when President Bill Clinton and Kim Jong-il, the father of Kim Jong-un, negotiated a nuclear freeze? Or to 2007, after the breakdown of the agreement and North Korea’s first nuclear test, when the Bush administration got a partial freeze – only for it too to collapse?

We don’t know. Donald Trump’s Twitter assessment is only that it was “a wonderful meeting with Chairman Kim Jong Un” and a “great honour” that he “stood on the soil of North Korea”.

But after Kim gave Trump his first summit and then resisted any denuclearisation, and refused to meet Pompeo, it looked like Trump was playing ego checkers while North Korea plays three-dimensional chess.

Those contrasting games continue – in return for giving Trump his holiday snaps, North Korea may get a lifting of some US sanctions without giving up its nuclear program.

But I’ll go a step further. Whatever game they’re playing, this latest vanity meeting has seen Donald Trump throw the board in the air. And it’s his officials who will have to try and find all the pieces.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

View comments