The Jamaica deportation charter flight is an outrage – but so are many others

The Home Office tried to deter any sympathy for the deportees by dubbing them all ‘foreign national offenders’

May Bulman
Thursday 07 February 2019 09:44
Comments
David Lammy accuses government of ‘pandering to far right’ after three more Windrush deaths revealed

The first charter flight to Jamaica since the Windrush scandal erupted last April has prompted sustained outrage – and rightly so. Stories of the people due to be on the flight have emerged in recent days and they are nothing short of heartbreaking. Some had young British-born children, at least one had a baby on the way. Many have been flown back to a country they barely know.

Their stories received no shortage of media and political attention. Days after news of the flight broke it escalated to a parliamentary debate. A seething David Lammy catechised the home secretary for it, and 58 MPs rallied together to call for an immediate halt to the flight through an open letter. At least seven of those due to be deported were granted last-minute reprieve – which almost certainly wouldn’t have happened without the public attention.

But charter flights to Jamaica and other Commonwealth countries are nothing new. More than 1,600 people were deported from the UK on 42 charter flights in 2017. One took off to Nigeria just a matter of weeks ago – yet none have garnered nearly the same level of public outrage as the one to Jamaica this week.

There is no doubt the flurry of rage over the flight was prompted by the association of the Caribbean to the Windrush scandal. Lammy attacked Sajid Javid in the Commons for deporting Jamaican nationals before the Windrush review was complete, questioning how the Home Office could be sure it wasn’t “making the same mistakes”.

He had a good point. But we are forgetting that the so-called “Windrush” issue spans far wider than the West Indies. In the months since the scandal broke, it has become increasingly clear that Nigerians, Indians and other Commonwealth nationals have also had their rights breached by the government’s hostile environment. Narrowing it to the Carribean is to hugely underplay the government’s error.

Besides, and perhaps more importantly, the charter flight isn’t really about Windrush. Most of the deportees were not Windrush citizens. Rather, their lives have been shattered by stringent and unapologetic Home Office rules which allow for families to be torn apart in the name of immigration targets. In the case of these deportees, it was the law that means anyone without a British passport who receives a jail sentence of more than 12 months is liable for deportation, regardless of circumstance.

Indeed, the Home Office tried to deter any sympathy for the deportees by dubbing them all “foreign national offenders” who have committed “very serious crimes such as rape and murder”. Yes, all the deportees had criminal convictions, but many were for far less serious crimes such as drug dealing and fraud, which were often committed many years ago. It is difficult for anyone to argue that this does not constitute a brutal double punishment.

And there are similar stories on the dozens of other charter flights that leave British soil each year. In fact, the majority of them are not only removing offenders, but people who do not for whatever reason fit into the often arbitrary immigration rules.

The deportation process itself is yet more punitive. Detainees have described hearing “screams” of people being taken from their cells in the early hours of the morning as guards escort them out to a coach to be driven to the airport. Recent inspection reports have noted the “inhumane” treatment of deportees while they are being removed, saying that they are “treated as commodities” and subjected to “excessive and ill-judged” use of restraint.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Of course, the government needs immigration controls. But the recent outcry over the Jamaica charter flight, as well as the Stanstead 15 trial in which activists narrowly avoided jail terms for protesting against mass removal, have shone a brighter light on the UK’s harsh deportation process – and generated public anger that was not there before.

The Windrush crisis may have been what drew our attention, but this cannot be viewed as a one-off or an exclusively Carribean issue. Charter flights take place routinely and in secret – and only sustained pressure on the Home Office will ensure more injustices do not arise in this way.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in