Red Eye viewers call out ‘preposterous’ plot holes after episode 1
New series sees ‘unrealistic’ plot unfold on a chaotic long-haul flight
Your support helps us to tell the story
This election is still a dead heat, according to most polls. In a fight with such wafer-thin margins, we need reporters on the ground talking to the people Trump and Harris are courting. Your support allows us to keep sending journalists to the story.
The Independent is trusted by 27 million Americans from across the entire political spectrum every month. Unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock you out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. But quality journalism must still be paid for.
Help us keep bring these critical stories to light. Your support makes all the difference.
Viewers of the new ITV drama Red Eye have called out enormous plot holes and a lack of attention to detail in the show.
The series follows Dr Matthew Nolan (played by Richard Armitage) who is extradited from the UK to Beijing to answer for the death of a woman found in the wreckage of his car.
Chinese-British police officer Hana Li (played by Argylle actor Jing Lusi) is ordered to escort Nolan back on the “red eye” flight – but not everyone onboard is who they seem. In a part whodunnit, part conspiracy thriller, the unlikely duo start fighting crime together.
As the first episode aired on Sunday night (21 April), viewers were quick to criticise the lack of attention to detail in the plot, such as the ad hoc extradition of Dr Nolan that happens almost instantaneously, in which he is not given any legal representation.
“I suppose we’re expected to forget about extradition laws and rights of a person to watch this,” wrote one viewer on X/Twitter.
“There are so many points of law being broken here. Bit preposterous. It’s fiction though right?” added another.
One viewer admitted: “The lack of any legal credibility in the plot of #RedEye is making it hard to enjoy.”
“Why do these contemporary ‘dramas’ have to be so unrealistic? None of the stuff we have just seen would ever happen. Do they think we’re all stupid?”
Another viewer concluded: “All shades of wrong. Wasn’t research done?”
However, others weighed into the debate to remind viewers to stop scrutinising particularities in the plot.
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
Watch Apple TV+ free for 7 days
New subscribers only. £8.99/mo. after free trial. Plan auto-renews until cancelled
“Why can’t people just enjoy a Fictional drama for what it is??” they wrote. “Instead of ripping every little detail to shreds! It’s a story! It’s not a documentary!! Just enjoy it for what it is! Best thing that has been on for weeks!”
In his two-star review for The Independent, TV critic Nick Hilton pointed out that “red eye” is a term used to short-haul flights that depart in the evening and arrive in the morning.
“It does not apply – however much the team behind a new ITV six-part thriller would like you to believe – to flights from Heathrow to Beijing, which take 10 hours and have a seven-hour time difference. No matter, though, because this lack of attention to detail is far from the most ridiculous part of Red Eye,” he writes.
Hilton concludes that Red Eye is “just about watchable” and “wholly ludicrous”.
Red Eye continues on Sundays at 9pm on ITV1 and ITVX.
If you’re travelling abroad and want to watch ‘Red Eye’ then you might need a VPN to unblock your streaming app. Our VPN roundup is here to help: get the best VPN deals on the market.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments