Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Chris Huhne: Nuclear power a costly failure

 

Steve Connor
Friday 14 October 2011 00:00 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Britain is still paying for nuclear-generated electricity consumed a generation ago because of the hidden costs of an industry reared on the expectation of public subsidies, the Energy Secretary Chris Huhne said yesterday.

He told the Royal Society in London that the nuclear industry and the Government should show that they have learned from their past mistakes if they are to retain public support for a renaissance in nuclear power. "And some of those mistakes are not small," he said in a keynote address. "Nuclear policy is a runner to be the most expensive failure of post-war British policy-making, and I am aware that this is a crowded and highly contested field."

Half of the budget of the Department for Energy and Climate Change goes on cleaning up Britain's legacy of nuclear waste, which includes the world's largest stockpile of civil plutonium waste, three Olympic-sized swimming pools of high-level waste, enough intermediate waste to fill a supertanker and even more low-level waste, he said. "That is £2bn a year, year in and year out, that we are continuing to pay for electricity that was consumed in the 1950s, 1960s and 1970s on a false prospectus," he told the Society. "The nuclear industry was like an expense-account dinner: everybody ordering the most expensive items on the menu because someone else was paying the bill."

Despite £49bn in nuclear liabilities, Mr Huhne said that it was important to press ahead with a new fleet of nuclear power stations to meet the challenge of climate change.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in