Brain's preference for simplicity the reason behind similarities between languages, finds study

To find out why, scientists created a new artificial language

Sarah Young
Monday 04 December 2017 10:34
Comments

The reason that there are so many commonalities between languages is because the human brain prefers to communicate simply, new research finds.

Despite there being an estimated 7,099 languages spoken throughout the world today, almost a third of them are endangered while just 23 represent more than half of the global population.

However, a new study led by University of Arizona researcher Masha Fedzechkina suggests that this might not have happened by chance.

Instead, she believes that similarities in structure that languages share could be a result of how the brain likes to process information – quickly and accurately.

“If we look at languages of the world, they are very different on the surface, but they also share a lot of underlying commonalities, often called linguistic universals or cross-linguistic generalisations,” Fedzechkina says.

To find out why that is the case, her team conducted a study in which two groups of English-speaking-only participants were each taught, over a three-day period, a new artificial language designed by the researchers.

The two languages were structured differently from each other, and, importantly, neither was structured like the participants' native English.

In both groups, the participants were taught two ways to express the same idea and then were asked to verbally describe what they saw in a video using their newly learnt language.

Interestingly, all of them had an overwhelming preference for using phrases and structures that had a short “dependency length”.

As such, the finding suggests that language universals might be explained, at least in part, by the human brain's innate preference for “short dependencies” - the distance between words that depend on each other to explain their meaning.

“The longer the dependencies are, the harder they are to process in comprehension, presumably because of memory constraints,” Fedzechkina explains.

“If we look cross-linguistically, we find that word orders of languages, overall, tend to have shorter dependencies than would be expected by chance, suggesting that there is a correlation between constraints on human information processing and the structures of natural languages.

“We wanted to do this research to provide the first behavioural evidence for a causal link between the two, and we did.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in