Knowing energy drinks are in your alcoholic cocktails will make you think you are more drunk

Despite drinking the same cocktail, the participants who knew they were drinking an energy drink as opposed to an 'exotic cocktail' perceived themselves to be more drunk

Olivia Blair
Friday 12 May 2017 09:50
Comments

Knowing you have added energy drinks to a spirit will make you think you are more drunk, a study has found, perhaps explaining that rapid feeling after a jagerbomb.

According to new research by the University of British Columbia Saunder School of Business, published in the Journal of Consumer Psychology, being told an energy drink has been added to your alcoholic drink can make you feel more drunk, daring and sexually self-confident.

Participants were made up of 154 heterosexual young men, described as “social drinkers, who were each given a cocktail containing vodka, red bull and fruit juice. The labelling of the cocktail either emphasised the presence of the energy drink (‘a vodka-Red Bull cocktail’) or it was described as a ‘vodka cocktail’ or ‘exotic cocktail’ instead.

The men were then asked to complete a series of tasks on a computer to measure their perceived drunkenness, attitudes and behaviours .

The researchers found that those who drank the cocktail aware that it contained an energy drink “significantly increased perceived intoxication, risk-taking and sexual self-confidence”.

“Red bull has long used the slogan ‘Red Bull gives you wings’ but our study shows that this type of advertising can make people think it has intoxicating qualities when it doesn’t,” lead researcher Yann Cornill explained. “When alcohol is mixed with an energy drink and people are aware of it, they feel like they’re more intoxicated simply because the marketing says they should feel that way.”

Previous studies have warned of a danger when it comes to mixing energy drinks and alcohol. In March, researchers found that the combination can increase the risk of injury on a night out as well as leading the person to stay out longer and drink more overall. Previous studies have also suggested a link between the concoction and sexual assault.

Positively, this study found that emphasising the content of an energy drink in the cocktail decreased the participants’ intentions to drink drive.

The researchers suggested that policy makers re-examine the regulation and codes about advertising and labelling of energy drinks and potentially consider restrictions based on their psychological effect as well as physiological.

“Given the study’s findings about the psychological effects of energy-drink marketing, energy drink marketers should be banned from touting the disinhibiting effects of their ingredients,” co-author Pierre Chandon said. “Regulations and codes of conduct should consider the psychological – and not just the physiological – effects of products.”

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in