Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Frances Cappuccini: NHS trust and anaesthetist cleared over death of mother after postnatal surgery

Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Trust was first health service body to be accused of corporate manslaughter

David Wilcock
Thursday 28 January 2016 13:46 GMT
Comments
Frances Cappuccini died hours after giving birth to her second son
Frances Cappuccini died hours after giving birth to her second son (PA)

An NHS trust and an anaesthetist on trial over the death of a mother hours after giving birth to her second son have been cleared after the landmark case collapsed.

Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust was accused of corporate manslaughter over the death of schoolteacher Frances Cappuccini, 30, in the first prosecution of a health service body since the offence was introduced in 2008.

Locum consultant anaesthetist Errol Cornish, 68, was accused of gross negligence manslaughter over his role in the care of the mother-of-two, who died after postnatal surgery at Tunbridge Wells Hospital in Pembury, Kent, in October 2012.

Errol Cornish had been accused of gross negligence manslaughter over his role (PA)

But judge Mr Justice Coulson instructed the jury at Inner London Crown Court to acquit both defendants on Thursday, just over two weeks into their trial, having ruled on Wednesday that they had no case to answer.

In his ruling, which can be reported for the first time today, he praised the Cappuccini family's "dignity" during the trial and said: "There is no question that Frances Cappuccini should not have died at the trust hospital on October 9.

Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells Trust was accused of corporate manslaughter (PA)

"It's inevitable that her family will want to know why she died and hold someone to account."

But the judge outlined a series of flaws in the prosecution case, including evidence that showed some of locum Dr Cornish's actions had been "about as far from a gross negligence manslaughter case as it is possible to be". He also branded some of the arguments against the trust as "perverse".

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in