Dr David Drew said that by offering 'no help to those who have suffered' the report would in fact have a 'further deterrent effect on staff raising concerns'
Dr David Drew said that by offering 'no help to those who have suffered' the report would in fact have a 'further deterrent effect on staff raising concerns'

NHS whistleblower: There's no protection for those who have already spoken out

Dr David Drew says Sir Robert Francis' report sends exactly the wrong message to staff considering raising concerns

Charlie Cooper
Saturday 14 February 2015 20:36

A landmark report into NHS whistleblowing failed to help medics who have already suffered for speaking out, and sends out "exactly the wrong message", a prominent whistleblower has claimed.

The report, compiled by the respected lawyer Sir Robert Francis, recommended a string of reforms including the appointment of a new national officer for NHS whistleblowing, as well as whistleblowing "guardians" at every hospital.

However, paediatrician Dr David Drew said that by offering "no help to those who have suffered" the report would in fact have a "further deterrent effect on staff raising concerns".

A former clinical director at Walsall Manor Hospital, Dr Drew was dismissed in December 2010, having previously raised concerns about what he said were poor standards of care.

He lost an employment tribunal appeal of unfair dismissal in 2013, but maintains that he was sacked for his whistleblowing activities.

In an open letter to Sir Robert published on Independent.co.uk, Dr Drew also questioned how the culture change the report said is needed could be achieved on a "foundation of injustice".

Reforms set out in the Freedom to Speak Up report received a cross-party welcome last week. The Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said they could be fast-tracked into law before the general election.

The report was ordered in the wake of several prominent cases, including Dr Drew’s, in which NHS staff were allegedly victimised by their employer after speaking out about patient safety fears. Many have lost their jobs or suffered ill health as a result. Sir Robert said that the treatment of some of whistleblowers had been "truly shocking".

While recommending that staff be protected from discrimination on the grounds of whistleblowing and calling for a new support service to get whistleblowers back into work, the report steered clear of adjudicating on individual cases and acknowledges that some whistleblowers would feel "their own personal issues have not been addressed".

In his letter Dr Drew writes: "…at the end of your report you tell us that you can recommend no help to those who have suffered such atrocities for doing nothing but what was required of them by their professional ethical codes….

"You have sent out exactly the wrong message. Whistleblowers are pawns who will not receive help, even from you. You have left us to our fate. This will have a further deterrent effect on staff raising concerns. The managers who have victimised us will feel more secure than they already were. They remain unaccountable. Patients who depend on our freedom to speak up will be less safe."

"…You call for a just culture in which we learn from honest mistakes and do not punish those who make them. But how can a just culture be built on the foundation of injustice which is laid down by your failure to address the victimisation so many have experienced?"

He said that NHS chief executives who had victimised whistleblowers should be "despatched" and urged a public inquiry into whistleblowing.

Sir Robert's report concluded that some individual cases had "endured over such a long time, and the issues have become so complex, that the most rigorous inquiry devoted to each such case would not have been able to resolve matters for those involved".

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in