Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Target accused of sexism over ‘pink tax’ on laxatives aimed at women

'Remember to check the gender of your stools'

Sarah Young
Thursday 30 May 2019 11:34 BST
Comments
Peppa Pig accused of sexism for using the word 'fireman'

US retailer Target has been accused of sexism for charging more than twice as much for laxatives aimed at women.

The backlash relates to the issue known as “pink tax” where products advertised towards women cost more than similar products marketed towards men.

On Monday, a Twitter user who goes by the handle @BUGPOSTING shared a photograph of two near-identical boxes of laxatives by brand Up & Up being sold at Target alongside the caption: “Paying the big bucks so I can perform gender, with my a**."

In the image, the box of 25 5mg tablets in a green box is currently on sale for $1.49 (£1.18), while the box of 25 5mg tablets in a pink box costs more than twice the price at $3.69 (£2.92).

The two items appear to be almost exactly the same apart from the colour of the product and that the pink laxative features a “comfort coating” for “sensitive stomachs”.

Both products contain the same number of tablets, the same dosage per tablet, and the same active ingredient.

Social media users have criticised the brand and supermarket for adding a pink tax to the product aimed at women, with the original post receiving 600 comments, 13,000 retweets and 89,000 likes.

Many people on Twitter expressed their disbelief at the brand’s attempt to gender bowel movements.

“Remember to check the gender of your stools,” one person wrote.

Another commented: “Twice as much for your lady's gentlebutt.”

While a third added: “Pooping! Now available FOR HER!”

Other users highlighted the fact that while there was a difference between the products, the brand could have marketed the product with the “comfort coating” at people who have sensitive stomachs, not just women.

“Not only is this medicine bizarrely performing gender, but what about the people who happen to be male who need sensitive stomach coating?” one person commented.

“Wouldn't marketing it as 'regular' and 'sensitive stomach' make more money, as they'd have 2x the potential market for both formulations?”

Another person agreed, adding: “I think it would make more sense to say its for sensitive stomachs rather than women.”

This isn’t the first time a brand has come under fire for charging more for products aimed at female consumers.

Earlier this year, Gillette was accused of sexism after it was found to be selling identical razors advertised towards men and women, with the women’s version costing $3 (£2.37) more.

In 2015, a report from The New York City Department of Consumer Affairs found that on average “women’s products cost seven per cent more than similar products for men,” with the increase applying to a number of products, from scooters to shampoo.

In March 2019, Liberal Democrat MP Christine Jardine introduced the Gender-based Pricing (Prohibition) Bill in the House of Commons.

The bill aims to help put a stop to products marketed towards women from being sold at a more expensive price than similar items aimed at men.

Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

“It is entirely unacceptable that in 2019 women and girls are still paying more than men for basic products, such as razors and deodorant.,” the Edinburgh West MP said.

“Whilst women are often still being paid less too, women really are being hit by a double whammy."

The Independent has contacted Target for comment.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in