Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

I have the Monopoly on being a sore loser - but a cashless game is a bad move

The makers of the popular board game have decided to ditch the fake notes

Donald Macinnes
Friday 19 February 2016 22:34 GMT
Comments
Cashing in: Donald openly hates playing Monopoly
Cashing in: Donald openly hates playing Monopoly (Getty Images)

If you are a very lucky person, gifted with a smart job or wealthy parents, you may well at some point have held in your hand wads of cash. To you it may be no big deal whatsoever to clasp a few grand in your hand.

However, for those of us not playing right midfield for the Arsenal or having Adele for a parent, pretty much the only time you will ever be able to hold a thick pile of cash in your hand is when you are playing Monopoly. And this is the reason why I frowned this morning when I read that the makers of said board game have launched a cashless version of the game.

Before I go on, I should give you some background on my relationship with Monopoly. To sum it up, I openly hate Monopoly. Always have done. I hate the way it takes seven hours to play it. I hate the way it turns ordinary punters into the smuggest of smug absentee landlords. I hate the bloody top hat and the naffing dog. I hate the way that, at the turn of a card, you can find yourself in jail for doing absolutely nothing to anyone, anywhere. It's like bloody Nicaragua in the 1980s: people disappearing right, left and centre. Most of all, I hate the way that my sister always, always won at Monopoly. She was the Donna Trump of her day, the Alana Sugar of south Glasgow.

There I would be, innocently traipsing around London's nicer streets in the guise of a pewter racecar. At the throw of a die, I would set foot on somewhere like Park Lane and of course, of course, my sister would have four hotels, a restaurant and a leisure centre already built on the site. She would tap some numbers into her calculator and – wham – I would be hit with a bill for several thousand "pounds". And while the money may have been fake, my resentment and fury was certainly all too real.

I may have tolerated this financial waterboarding for half an hour or so, but eventually I would get sick of the sight of my sister's towering stacks of cash and explode in a cash-poor temper. The board would then go flying, my sister's burgeoning property empire would sail through the air and I would be labelled, quite rightly, a bad-tempered bad loser with no hope of ever making any real money.

So you can see why I might greet the news of a new cashless Monopoly game with sadness. Yes, the game will be shorter, yes there won't be the temptation to stash the money up your sleeve for a rainy day. But think how easy it will be to get into financial difficulties. Paper money is real. When you hand it over for a purchase, it is a tangible thing that is leaving your possession.

If all we have to do to buy some naff property on Old Kent Road is have our card scanned, I worry that too many people (me, mainly) will fall into the trap of viewing it as not really money and end up in real trouble. I think in future I'll stick to KerPlunk.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in