Capita faces second inquiry into £1.5bn Whitehall jobs contract

Whitehall officials confirm they were “looking into” concerns

Chris Green
Wednesday 18 February 2015 20:37
Comments

Capita is facing a second investigation into its handling of a major government contract after the controversial outsourcing giant was accused of imposing “absolutely appalling” terms on small businesses.

Dozens of companies have complained about a £1.5bn contract between the Cabinet Office and Capita, which allows the firm to control the recruitment of specialist contractors and temporary staff across government, and are now refusing to take part at all.

Whitehall officials confirmed they were “looking into” the concerns raised by the small firms, the second investigation to be launched into Capita’s operations in two weeks.

The new row comes after The Independent revealed that the outsourcing giant has been accused of using a different £250m contract to short-change small firms, resulting in some going out of business. Francis Maude, the Cabinet Office minister, has described the situation as “not acceptable”.

The second contract, known as Contingent Labour 1 (CL1), was drawn up by Crown Commercial Services, the arm of the Cabinet Office charged with buying in billions of pounds’ worth of services for government.

The Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) involved, who requested to remain anonymous, claim that they are being marginalised by the terms of the contract, which they say allows their contractors to work directly for Capita – cutting them out of the chain.

Some of the companies are boycotting the contract entirely, a decision that they say has cost them tens of millions of pounds in lost revenue. “The architecture of the contract is absolutely appalling and provides scope for Capita to slam SMEs to the wall long-term,” one firm told the PoliticsHome website.

Like the previous contract, under which Capita agreed to provide civil service learning and development training, the terms of CL1 allows it a 20 per cent cut of the value of all the contracts.

The firms are also angry that Capita has banned them from signing “restrictive covenants”, employment clauses that prevent staff from going directly to work for competitors. They say this leaves Capita free to bypass them and deal directly with their contractors.

A spokesperson for the Cabinet Office said: “Since 2010 this Government has introduced a radical programme of commercial reform as part of our long-term economic plan. Our reforms helped contribute to savings of £14.3bn last year alone, while dramatically increasing the proportion of business won by SMEs.

“However, we know there’s more to do. We always take concerns from suppliers very seriously, have introduced new ways for concerns to be raised, and are looking at the issues highlighted.”

In a statement, Capita said it had “an excellent track record” of working with SMEs. “More than 60 per cent of the work under CL1 has been awarded to SMEs. The framework has been designed, and is run, in the manner required by Government to ensure a level playing field and best value for money.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in