European Commission clamps down on Belgian multinational tax dodge

Ruling on Belgian scheme to impact 35 global firms, including the beer giant AB Inbev

Simon Read
Tuesday 12 January 2016 02:16
Comments
Margrethe Vestager, the EU competition commissioner, said the dodge creates ‘unequal footing’ (Re
Margrethe Vestager, the EU competition commissioner, said the dodge creates ‘unequal footing’ (Re

Some 35 multinational companies will be forced to hand back €700m (£524m) in tax that they failed to pay under an outlawed Belgian “excess profit” tax scheme.

The European Commission ruled yesterday that selective tax advantages granted by Belgium are illegal under EU state aid rules. The commission didn’t name any of the mainly European companies hit by the ruling, but reports suggested they included global brewer AB Inbev and British American Tobacco.

Other companies linked to the scandal included Atlas Copco, BP, BASF, Belgacom (now known as Proximus Group), Celio and Wabco.

Margrethe Vestager, the commissioner in charge of competition policy, said: “Belgium has given a select number of multinationals substantial tax advantages that break EU state aid rules. It distorts competition … by putting smaller competitors who are not multinational on an unequal footing.”

She pointed out there are many legal ways for EU countries to subsidise investment, but if a country gives multinationals illegal tax benefits that allow them to avoid paying taxes on the majority of their actual profits, it seriously harms fair competition, “ultimately at the expense of EU citizens”.

AB Inbev, still awaiting regulatory approval on its proposed merger with SABMiller, confirmed that it benefits from the type of tax ruling judged illegal by regulators. It said it was disappointed by the EU’s decision: “We will consider our options, taking into account the reactions by the Belgian authorities.” That was believed to suggest that it may appeal against the decision with the EU’s top courts in Luxembourg.

The ruling is the latest in the EU’s crackdown on global tax avoidance. In October the EU ruled that Starbucks in the Netherlands and Fiat in Luxembourg had benefited from illegal tax deals and ordered the governments to reclaim up to €30m from each company. However, both decisions are expected to go to appeal.

The latest investigation centred on the Belgian “excess profit” tax scheme, in force since 2005, which allowed multinational companies to pay substantially less tax in Belgium. The scheme cut the corporate tax base of the companies by up to 90 per cent.

The EC ruled that the scheme diverged from normal practice under Belgian company tax rules, which is illegal under EU state aid rules.

The ruling is just the tip of the iceberg, claimed Anders Dahlbeck, the tax justice policy adviser at ActionAid.

“The scheme is one of many unfair corporate tax giveaways that have allowed companies to duck paying their fair share of tax in the EU and in the poorest countries in the world,” he said.

The international charity reckons that developing countries lose $138bn (£95bn) a year to similar corporate tax breaks.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in