Sats tests endangering children's learning and mental health, MPs warn

'High stakes' national curriculum tests for primary school children are too closely linked to school performance and even damage children's education, a cross-party report states

Rachael Pells
Education Correspondent
Monday 01 May 2017 10:18
Comments
Head teachers said last year's primary school results were too unreliable to be used for league tables, following a series of leaks and cancellations
Head teachers said last year's primary school results were too unreliable to be used for league tables, following a series of leaks and cancellations

Young children are at risk of developing mental health problems as a result of “high-stakes” SATs testing, a cross-party committee of MPs has warned.

Compulsory national curriculum tests taken by primary school pupils are too closely linked to school performance, the House of Commons Education Committee has said, and are having a negative impact on children’s education and wellbeing.

In a new report on primary assessment, the committee found pupils are being taught a narrower curriculum, with staff neglecting arts and humanities subjects by focusing too heavily on maths and English to ensure pupils pass the controversial exams.

It calls for a major overhaul of annual league tables, suggesting a new system be introduced to show a school’s results over a three-year average, instead of over one year.

Committee chairman Neil Carmichael said that while schools need to be held accountable for children’s progress and achievement, action is needed to lower the stakes.

The report, which comes a week before pupils across England sit the tests, warns: “Assessment is closely linked to the accountability system in primary schools, with Key Stage 2 results used to hold schools and teachers to account on the progress and attainment of pupils.

“However, the high stakes system can negatively impact teaching and learning, leading to narrowing of the curriculum and ‘teaching to the test’, as well as affecting teacher and pupil wellbeing.”

It adds: “The stakes should be lowered at primary school in order to combat some of these negative impacts.

“Performance tables should include a rolling three-year average of Key Stage 2 attainment and progress data to reduce the focus on an individual year’s results.”

The committee also suggests that Ofsted should not focus too heavily on SATs when inspecting schools.

Last month, evidence presented by teachers across the country revealed concerns that children as young as four were suffering from mental health problems such as panic attacks, eating disorders, anxiety and depression.

Responding to a survey for the Nasuwt union, more than four-fifths (84 per cent) of teachers and school leaders said they could attribute the pressure of exams and testing to increasing mental health issues seen in children.

The Government has agreed to scrap SATs for six and seven-year olds next year, just one year after pupils were made to sit tougher papers based on a new national curriculum.

The tests, which were condemned by teachers and parents, saw just 53 per cent of pupils reach the new expected standard in reading, writing and maths.

Under the previous system, 80 per cent achieved a Level 4 or above in these core subjects. Ministers stressed the results were not comparable, however.

Union leaders branded the 2016 results a “shambles”, and teachers have since threatened a boycott of all primary school tests, including SATs for 11-year-olds and the proposed new “baseline” assessments for four and five-year-olds.

Education Secretary Justine Greening avoids question of which expert backs more grammar schools

Mr Carmichael said: “Many of the negative effects of assessment in primary schools are caused by the use of results in the accountability system rather than the assessment system itself.

“The resulting high-stakes system has led to a narrowing of the curriculum with a focus on English and maths at the expense of other subjects like science, humanities and the arts.

“It is right that schools are held to account for their performance but the Government should act to lower the stakes and help teachers to deliver a broad, balanced, and fulfilling curriculum for primary school children.”

Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers said last year’s tests were “a mess of chaos and confusion”, following a series of test leaks and cancellations.

“Add in to this the high stakes nature of the system for school leaders, and you get a toxic mix.”

He added: “The Committee’s call to scrap the publication of results from a single cohort, proposing instead a rolling three year average of Key Stage 2 results, is therefore very welcome. Data is useful, but it is important to recognise its limitations.”

A Department for Education spokeswoman said: “We will consider the recommendations of this report carefully and respond in due course. A consultation relating to primary assessment is ongoing.”

She added that the department has committed to introducing no new tests before 2018/19.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in