Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Utterly wrong! Flawed! Academics deride league tables that guide Michael Gove's reforms

Model used to calculate triennial rankings contains 'profound' error, says mathematician

Paul Gallagher
Friday 19 July 2013 16:13 BST
Academics deride league tables that guide Michael Gove's reforms
Academics deride league tables that guide Michael Gove's reforms (PA)

The world's most influential education league tables used by Michael Gove as a reason for "whole system reform" of the sector have been derided as "useless and meaningless" by two academic studies.

The Education Secretary regularly points to Britain's position in the "landmark" Programme for International Student Assessment (Pisa) rankings of 15-year-olds' science, maths and reading ability to justify his policies. In a speech last year to the Education World Forum Mr Gove even described the German mathematician who runs Pisa, Andreas Schleicher, as "the most important man in the British education system".

Dr Hugh Morrison, a mathematician from Queens University, Belfast, said that the model used to calculate the triennial rankings is "utterly wrong" because it contains a "profound" conceptual error that confuses objective and subjective probability. "Pisa will never work", he added.

Professor Svend Kreiner, a statistician from the University of Copenhagen in Denmark, also said the Pisa model is fundamentally flawed. In a paper published this summer, he challenges Pisa's reliability and shows how results fluctuate significantly according to which test questions are used. He also reveals how, in the 2006 reading rankings, Canada could have been positioned anywhere between second and 25th, Japan between eighth and 40th and the UK between 14th and 30th.

Mr Gove has said that Britain between 2000 and 2009 "plummeted in the world rankings from 4th to 16th for science, 7th to 25th for literacy and 8th to 28th for maths". Pisa's 2012 results are published later this year.

The questions used for Pisa vary between countries and between students participating in the same assessment. In the 2006 tests half the students were not asked any reading questions but were allocated "plausible" reading scores to help calculate their countries' rankings. Responding to the news of the studies in today's TES, one teacher said: "The first year our kids did the PISA test, the science content was aligned to aspects of 5-14 that we never taught. [One asked]: 'Sir, why did they ask about dinosaurs and geology when we don't do it?'"

Professor Kreiner says the Rasch model used by Pisa can only work if the questions are of the same level of difficulty for each country taking the test. He said his research proves that this is not the case and therefore the comparisons that Pisa makes between countries are "useless".

Professor Kreiner first raised the issue two years ago, but the Organisation for Economic Development and Co-Operation (OECD), which runs Pisa, countered by suggesting that he had been able to find such wild fluctuations in rankings only by deliberately selecting particular small groupings of questions to prove his point.

Professor Kreiner's latest paper uses the same groups of questions as Pisa and comes up with very similar results to his initial analysis. "It is meaningless to try to compare reading in Chinese with reading in Danish," he said today.

Dr Morrison said that the Rasch model made the "impossible" claim of being able to measure ability independently of the questions that students answer. "I am certain this (problem) cannot be answered," he told TES.

A spokesperson for the OECD claimed that country rankings take account of "the uncertainty that results from sample data" adding: "No model exactly fits the data. Pisa will always seek to improve and learn from the latest research methods."

Christine Blower, General Secretary of the National Union of Teachers, said: "Michael Gove's habitual simplification and half-truths about Pisa have for many years formed the central plank of his justifications for widespread reform. These new calls from academics should encourage all to take the Secretary of State's every utterance on standards with a large pinch of salt."

A Department for Education spokesperson said: “While there will always be academic debate over methodology, international benchmarking is vitally important to ensure we are competing with the world’s best-performing education systems.”

Flawed evidence: Gove’s gaffes

Michael Gove has often been accused of citing flawed or non-existent research.

A Freedom of Information request revealed that PR surveys by Premier Inn and UKTV Gold were the source of his evidence when he said British teenagers were ignorant about key historical events.

In April, he told a conference that in the Far East “school days are longer, school holidays are shorter”. In fact, English pupils spend around 7,250 hours in the classroom, far more than South Korea, at 6,000, and Japan, at 6,300.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in