Pfizer antibodies may only partially protect against omicron, early study suggests

Results of first laboratory experiments on new variant ‘better than I expected’, scientist says

Andy Gregory
Tuesday 07 December 2021 22:41
Vaccine for Omicron Variant Could Take Months, Says Moderna CEO
Leer en Español

The omicron coronavirus variant may be able to better evade the protection offered by the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine than the initial Covid virus type – but only partially, a small study has suggested.

There appears to be a “very large drop” in immunity against the new variant among those given Pfizer’s vaccine, said Alex Sigal, a professor at the Africa Health Research Institute, after his laboratory studied blood samples of 12 people vaccinated with the jab.

But – in results with promising implications for booster jabs – antibodies in samples from those who had been both double-vaccinated and naturally infected with coronavirus appeared significantly more effective against the new variant, according to the study, which has not yet been peer-reviewed.

Even if current vaccines prove less effective at preventing breakthrough infections in people who are double-vaccinated, scientists widely expect them to continue to offer significant protection against severe illness and death.

Studying the samples, the team in South Africa found a 41-fold decrease in levels of neutralising antibodies against the omicron variant compared with the first iteration of the virus. Previously, the beta variant had seen a threefold drop.

While these results showed “much more extensive escape”, the researchers wrote that “previous infection, followed by vaccination or booster is likely to increase the neutralisation level and likely confer protection from severe disease in omicron infection”.

They also found that the omicron variant appears to use the same protein as previous iterations of the virus, the ACE2 receptor, in order to bind with human cellswhich is the target of current vaccines.

Prof Sigal wrote on Twitter that the results were “better than I expected of omicron”, adding: “The fact that it still needs the ACE2 receptor and that escape is incomplete means it’s a tractable problem with the tools [we’ve] got.”

He added that the data from the study was likely to be adjusted as the team continued their experiments.

Responding to Prof Sigal’s summary of the findings, Sir Jeremy Farrar, the director of the Wellcome Trust, thanked the team for their “hugely important” and “sobering” work.

And Professor Danny Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London, urged those eligible to get their booster dose, saying: “Most boosted people would fend this off nicely, even with the 40x drop.”

Amid wide praise for the team’s quick work in putting the study together, Catherine Moore, a consultant clinical scientist in virology at Public Health Wales, said: “Fantastic to see this out so soon. I think it shows what we expected, and it’s certainly not completely doom and gloom.”

The headline of this story was amended shortly after publication. It initially read: “Pfizer vaccine ‘may be up to 40 times less effective’ against omicron variant, early study suggests”, but that was not accurate. While the study found a 41-fold decrease in levels of neutralising antibodies against the omicron variant compared with the first iteration of the virus, that does not equate to a corresponding drop in the vaccine’s efficiency.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in