Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Net neutrality: Justice Department sues California hours after state enacts new regulation

‘While the Trump administration does everything in its power to undermine our democracy, we in California will continue to do what’s right for our residents,’ the bill’s author says

Anthony Cuthbertson
Monday 01 October 2018 15:22 BST
Comments
What is net neutrality?

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) is set to file a lawsuit against California, just hours after the state introduced a new bill to protect net neutrality.

According to campaigners in favour of net neutrality, the new law will help ensure a free and open internet by preventing Internet Service Providers (ISPs) like Verizon and AT&T from creating “fast lanes” for firms who are willing and able to pay for their traffic to be prioritised.

Measures to protect net neutrality were first introduced under the Obama administration, however they were abolished in December by the Trump-era Federal Communications Commission.

“While the Trump administration does everything in its power to undermine our democracy, we in California will continue to do what’s right for our residents,” said California state senator Scott Wiener, who authored the net neutrality bill.

The DOJ claims that the law passed by California governor Jerry Brown is an attempt to “subvert the federal government’s deregulatory approach” to the internet.

“Under the constitution, states do not regulate interstate commerce – the federal government does,” said attorney general, Jeff Sessions.

“Once again the California legislature has enacted an extreme and illegal state law attempting to frustrate federal policy. The Justice Department should not have to spend valuable time and resources to file this suit today, but we have a duty to defend the prerogatives of the federal government and protect our constitutional order.”

“California’s decision to fight this battle in the legislature also sets it apart from other states that have enshrined limited protections through a governor’s executive order, which can only dictate ISPs’ conduct in state contracts,” Hayley Tsukayama, a legislative activist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), said in a blog post praising the new California law.

“Laws are also harder to reverse than executive orders, ensuring that these important consumer protections cannot be reversed in the future with the flick of a pen,” she said.

Ms Tsukayama said the EFF will keep pushing for pro-net neutrality legislation to be passed across the US.

“We will continue to fight for a free and open internet in the state of California and encourage other states across the country to look at the bill as a template for their own net neutrality rules.”

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in