Police bugging was a shambles

Steve Boggan
Wednesday 22 January 1997 00:02
Comments

An inquiry into the control of police telephone taps has uncovered shambolic procedures that led to details of 900 bugging operations apparently going astray.

Detectives called in to investigate how a corrupt colleague gained access to secret phone transcripts for a criminal had to trace 396 officers from 35 forces to find out what had happened to secret records that should have been destroyed.

The National Criminal Intelligence Service (NCIS), which controls phone taps under the 1985 Interception of Communications Act, moved quickly yesterday to assure the public that all the records had now been accounted for, but it could do nothing to hide the apparent lapses in security over the most sensitive information available to police forces.

John Stevens, the former chief constable of Northumbria, was called in to investigate by NCIS in December 1995 after it emerged that lawyers acting for John Donald, a former South East Regional Crime Squad officer, had details of a phone tap on a criminal who was paying him. Donald, who should not have had access to the records, was subsequently jailed for 11 years for corruption.

Under interception legislation, senior officers are allowed to examine the transcripts of bugging operations and can make notes to take away in specially issued and logged notebooks which must be returned and destroyed at the end of investigations. However, when he began his inquiry, Mr Stevens found that around 900 notebooks had apparently not been returned. The only administrative system was a ledger that was woefully incomplete.

During a 12-month inquiry involving 12 Northumbria detectives, all the unaccounted for notebooks were either tracked down or "accounted for". Asked whether some of the notebooks were traced to detectives' "offices, garages or bedrooms", one officer in the inquiry smiled and nodded.

Albert Pacey, the director-general of NCIS who called in Mr Stevens's team, said the inquiry had found no evidence that any information had been lost or that any investigations were compromised by the circulation of notebooks. "As a result of the lapse, Mr Stevens has made a large number of recommendations, all of which I have accepted," said Mr Pacey.

Mr Stevens, who examined Customs and Excise controls on phone taps as part of his inquiry, said: "We interviewed 396 serving or retired officers from 35 of the 43 forces and I am satisfied that all the original material has been accounted for. That does not mean that there are not photocopies about."

"I wish this had not happened," said Mr Pacey. "But at least I can reassure the public by pointing out that, as soon as we realised something was wrong, we called an outside force in to conduct an inquiry, we reported ourselves to the Parliamentary Commissioner and we alerted the media to show that we are fully accountable. Nothing was swept under the carpet.

"Now, with new safeguards in place or on the way, we will do our best to ensure there are no similar problems in the future."

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

By clicking ‘Create my account’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in