Human lifespan could keep rising ‘far into the foreseeable future’, say researchers
Idea that the historic, sharp rise in lifespan had recently hit a ‘plateau’ is not supported by the available evidence, scientists say
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The lifespans of human beings could continue to rise “far into the foreseeable future”, according to two researchers who have dismissed the idea of a natural limit.
In October, researchers in the US argued that the chance of living beyond the age of 115 was incredibly small, based on an analysis of people over the age of 110 in four countries, the UK, US, France and Japan.
This represented a “ceiling” or “barrier” to human life that would never be surpassed by the vast majority of people, they wrote in the journal Nature. Jeanne Calment, a French woman who lived to 122, was simply an incredibly unlikely exception.
However, two other experts in the field have now hit back, claiming the idea that the historic, sharp rise in lifespan had recently hit a “plateau” was not supported by the available evidence.
Dr Bryan Hughes and Professor Siegfried Hekimi, of McGill University in Canada, claimed in the same journal that the idea was “largely a product of the limited data available for analysis, owing to the challenges inherent in collecting and verifying the lifespans of extremely long-lived individuals”.
And Professor Hekimi said: “We just don't know what the age limit might be. In fact, by extending trend lines, we can show that maximum and average lifespans could continue to increase far into the foreseeable future.”
He said it was “hard to guess” how long people might live in the future.
“Three hundred years ago, many people lived only short lives,” he said. “If we would have told them that one day most humans might live up to 100, they would have said we were crazy.”
However, the original authors, led by Xiao Dong of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, stood by their findings.
Replying to the McGill academics, they said projections of lifespan up to 2300 were “imaginative” but “not informative”.
“We feel that our interpretation of the data as pointing towards a limit to human lifespan of about 115 years remains valid,” they wrote.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments