IVF mistake means 26 women’s eggs might have been fertilised by the wrong sperm
Mix-ups have previously led to people accidentally having children with people they’d never met
![The results in parts of England contrasted to those in Scotland, Wales and Ireland, where IVF access is nationally standardised](https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2016/05/16/09/ivf.jpg)
Support truly
independent journalism
Our mission is to deliver unbiased, fact-based reporting that holds power to account and exposes the truth.
Whether $5 or $50, every contribution counts.
Support us to deliver journalism without an agenda.
![Louise Thomas](https://static.independent.co.uk/static-assets/support-us/louise-thomas.png)
Louise Thomas
Editor
A mistake at a Dutch IVF clinic means that up to 26 women may have accidentally had their eggs fertilised with the wrong sperm.
After a “procedural error” at the University Medical Centre in Utrecht that happened between mid-April 2015 and mid-November 2016, as many as 26 couples may have had egg cells fertilised with sperm cells from another couple, the centre has said.
“During fertilisation, sperm cells from one treatment couple may have ended up with the egg cells of 26 other couples,” a statement from the centre said.
“Therefore there’s a chance that the egg cells have been fertilised by sperm other than that of the intended father.”
The chance that the mistake has happened is small, and may not have happened to all of the 26 couples, the centre said. But the possibility “could not be excluded”, it said.
All of the affected couples have been informed, he said. It has launched an investigation to give more information about what might have happened.
Half the women who underwent treatment have already become pregnant or given birth. Others may have embryos frozen at the clinic that have all been fertilised by sperm from someone else.
In-vitro fertilisation is intended as a way of allowing people who might otherwise not be able to conceive to do so. It is done by collecting mature eggs from a woman’s ovaries and fertilising them with sperm, all in a laboratory, and those eggs are then implanted in the uterus with the hope that they grow into a baby.
Similar mistakes have led to serious mistakes in the past. In 2012, a Singapore mother alleged that her clinic had mixed up the sperm intended for the father – she had noticed that something appeared to be wrong when her child had a markedly different skin tone from her caucasian husband, according to news reports.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments