Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Stray seeds land farmer in court

Marie Woolf,Saskatchewan
Sunday 14 March 1999 00:02 GMT
Comments

FARMERS WHO find that stray genetically modified seeds have blown on to their land from neighbours' fields and then taken root could face massive fines if the agrochemical giant Monsanto wins a test case in a Canadian court.

Percy Schmeiser, a farmer in Saskatchewan, Canada, is being pursued by Monsanto for damages and the profits from his fields because the company claims that the patent on its genetically modified (GM) seeds has been violated. GM canola (rape) plants from Monsanto seeds were found growing among his crops. The farmer believes that the seeds blew on to his land.

If Monsanto wins the test case, due to go to court this autumn, British farmers in similar situations could also face court cases culminating in having to pay thousands of pounds in compensation.

But Mr Schmeiser never signed a contract to grow Monsanto's GM canola and says he is not liable to the big fines the company imposes for using seed from crops. His fields run along a main road which links a grain silo and a rubbish dump where used seed sacks are thrown away. The prairies can be windy and cut crops are often blown on to neighbouring fields.

Mr Schmeiser, who has spent thousands of dollars on legal fees and who will have to pay a massive bill if he loses, has a library of photographs showing stray seeds and plants from neighbouring farmers.

In Canada and the US, Monsanto has hired Robinson Investigations, a private firm founded by former police officers, to question farmers and take samples from their land.

Farmers complain of "intimidation" and "bullying", and fear they could lose their farms. Monsanto, to give farmers a chance to inform on their neighbours, has also set up a toll-free "snitch line" on which people can tell Monsanto that growers are using their technology without paying for it.

But many growers claim that the line is being used to settle old scores. Mr Schmeiser has been contacted by dozens of farmers throughout North America who feel they are being "intimidated".

One of the other farmers facing massive fines for violating Monsanto's patent on its "technology" is Edward Zielinski, a 63-year-old who farms 1,600 acres in Danora, Saskatchewan. He is facing a claim of $29,000 (pounds 12,000) for growing Monsanto's Roundup Ready Canola without a licence.

Mr Zielinski, who has also had private detectives hired by Monsanto turn up on his farm, is adamant that he did not know that some canola seed he traded with another farmer for wheat was engineered by Monsanto. Documents seen by The Independent on Sunday also show that Monsanto wants Mr Zielinski to allow employees to walk on to his land to take samples for three years and to sign a gagging clause about the "terms and conditions" of the settlement agreement. But the agreement also gives Monsanto "the right to disclose the facts and settlement terms associated with the Investigation and this Settlement Agreement".

The Canadian High Commission in London said that Canada's politicians were monitoring the case closely and were aware of concerns by farmers.

UK environmental groups fear that Monsanto may try to import its American policies, including the use of private detectives and tip-off lines, to Britain. "Monsanto's thuggish tactics are now becoming apparent everywhere from Canada to the US and New Zealand," said Charles Secrett, director of Friends of the Earth.

A spokesman for Monsanto Canada defended the pursuit of farmers, the tip-off line and the investigations as a "deterrent". He said the private investigators were instructed to be polite and behave in a civil manner. "In Canada last year we audited 230 growers. Ninety per cent of growers who we audited felt it was in a professional manner," said Craig Evans, general manager of Biotechnology and Seed, Monsanto Canada. "I don't want to say that there isn't the odd guy who gets over-zealous, but our intent is not to intimidate or bully people. Our intent is not to take people to court. What we are trying to do is create a deterrent so that people understand that we are serious."

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in