Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Judge asked to decide whether businessman’s ex-wife should get more money

Mr Justice Cohen is analysing the latest round of a long-running fight between James Goddard-Watts and ex-wife Julia at a private High Court hearing

Brian Farmer
Tuesday 25 January 2022 12:25 GMT
A High Court judge has been asked to decide whether a millionaire businessman who is a member of the family which founded the Screwfix hardware chain should hand more money to his ex-wife (PA)
A High Court judge has been asked to decide whether a millionaire businessman who is a member of the family which founded the Screwfix hardware chain should hand more money to his ex-wife (PA) (PA Archive)

A judge has been asked to decide whether a millionaire businessman – whose family founded the Screwfix chain – should hand over more money to his ex-wife.

Mr Justice Cohen is analysing the latest round of a long-running row between James Goddard-Watts and former wife Julia at a hearing in the Family Division of the High Court in London.

The judge is overseeing a private trial, which is due to end next month, and has placed limits on what can be reported.

Judges have been told Mr and Mrs Goddard-Watts, who are both in their 50s, reached an agreement in 2010 after the end of their 13-year marriage.Mr Goddard-Watts agreed Mrs Goddard-Watts should get a house worth £3.25 million and a £4 million lump sum.

She subsequently complained Mr Goddard-Watts had not revealed the full extent of his wealth.

A judge then concluded Mr Goddard-Watts had “given a false presentation” when making the 2010 agreement, and in 2016 the businessman was told to hand Mrs Goddard-Watts more than £6 million.

Mrs Goddard-Watts returned to court again in 2018 and made a further complaint.

She said Mr Goddard-Watts had not given full detail about the potential value of a deal he was involved in.

A judge ruled in her favour in late 2019.

Mr Justice Holman said if the pair could not agree on a sum, a judge should again reassess evidence and decide if Mrs Goddard-Watts should get more money.

He said a case in which a woman had twice complained about “non-disclosure” after a settlement was “vanishingly rare” and “probably unique”.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in