Britain would be ‘comprehensively outgunned and outranged’ in war with Russia, report says

Army’s ‘critical shortage’ of artillery means it lacks ‘lacks a credible or competitive warfighting capability’, according to research

Samuel Osborne
Wednesday 27 November 2019 13:40
Soldiers of the Royal Artillery take part in the Artillery's 300th anniversary celebrations at Knighton Down on 26 May, 2016 in Lark Hill
Soldiers of the Royal Artillery take part in the Artillery's 300th anniversary celebrations at Knighton Down on 26 May, 2016 in Lark Hill

The British Army would be “comprehensively outgunned and outranged” in a war with Russia in eastern Europe, according to a report by a defence think tank.

A “critical shortage” of artillery means Britain currently “lacks a credible or competitive warfighting capability” in the “unlikely” event of a conflict against Russia, research by the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) said.

It said Russian brigades outstrip British ones in terms of firepower and range, leaving them “free to prosecute fire missions with impunity” which would “thereby lead to the defeat of UK units”.

The paper recommends: “If conventional deterrence is to remain a key component of the UK’s National Security Strategy then the modernisation of its fires capabilities should be a top priority.”

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Defence described the report as “one dimensional” in that it pits the British Army against the Russian army alone and said it it was “completely implausible” the UK would fight one-on-one with Russia.

“The UK does not stand alone but alongside its Nato allies, who work closely together across air, sea, land, nuclear and cyber to deter threats and respond to crises,” the spokesperson said.

“As the largest Nato defence spender in Europe, the UK’s armed forces are well equipped to take a leading role in countering threats and ensuring the safety and security of British people at home and abroad.”

The Rusi report, titled The Future of Fires: Maximising the UK’s Tactical and Operational Firepower, considered the UK’s capabilities in the “unlikey” event of a “high-intensity conflict between Nato and Russia, in which the UK has promised to deliver a warfighting division”.

It said: “At present, there is a risk that the UK – unable to credibly fight – can be dominated lower down the escalation ladder by powers threatening escalation.”

It gives the example of the destruction of two Ukranian battalions destroyed by Russian artillery “within a five-minute period” in 2014, which it said “sent a shiver of alarm through Western militaries, for good reason”.

The report said in the early stages of a conflict with Russia, the RAF would likely look to ground forces to provide supporting firepower.

“Given that this firepower does not exist within the ground forces, it may be concluded that at present Britain lacks a credible or competitive warfighting capability in a conflict in Eastern Europe against Russia,” the report said.

“The rejuvenation and modernisation of Britain’s ground-based fires is consequently an urgent and critical priority.”

The report recommends the UK either retains a sufficient stockpile of anti-armour and high explosive munitions, or “reconsider its commitments to the Oslo Treaty, and procure cluster munitions”.

It says the “moral objections to the use of cluster munitions can be mitigated”, before adding such objections “become somewhat moot” as Russian and US forces would “employ cluster munitions liberally” in a conflict in eastern Europe.

It comes after Emmanuel Macron, France’s president, described the “brain death” of Nato due to waning US support for the military alliance.

The UK will host world leaders, including Donald Trump, the US president, in London for a 70th anniversary Nato summit in early December.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies


Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in