MI5 did not pass ‘highly relevant’ intelligence to police before Manchester Arena bombing

Salman Abedi had initially been made an MI5 ‘subject of interest’ in 2014 but was not thought to be a security threat

Lizzie Dearden
Security Correspondent
Wednesday 27 October 2021 23:14
<p>MI5 had been receiving intelligence about Salman Abedi for years before the attack </p>

MI5 had been receiving intelligence about Salman Abedi for years before the attack

MI5 failed to pass on two “highly relevant” pieces of intelligence to counter-terror police in the months leading up to the Manchester Arena bombing, a public inquiry has heard.

A previous review revealed that MI5 did not appreciate the significance of the intelligence at the time, but in retrospect it was “highly relevant” to Salman Abedi’s plans.

Detective Chief Superintendent Dominic Scally, head of Counter Terrorism Policing North West, said neither piece of intelligence was given to his officers.

Sir John Saunders, chair of the inquiry, has ruled that details could not be made public and will be heard in closed sessions of the public inquiry, where families, their lawyers and the media will be excluded for reasons of national security.

A review conducted by Lord Anderson QC, which was published in December 2017, had said: “On two separate occasions in the months prior to the attack, intelligence was received by MI5 whose significance was not fully appreciated at the time.

“It was assessed at the time to relate not to terrorism but to possible non-nefarious activity or to criminality on the part of Salman Abedi. In retrospect, the intelligence can be seen to have been highly relevant to the planned attack.”

On Tuesday, the inquiry heard that MI5 also failed to take action that would have seen Abedi stopped by police when he returned from Libya days before the attack.

He flew back into the UK alone on 18 May 2017 - four days before he launched the suicide bombing - but was not stopped on his return to Manchester Airport.

An MI5 officer who can be named only as Witness J admitted that police could have apprehended the terrorist under terror laws, questioned him and seized his electronic devices.

The stop would have been under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000, which empowers police to determine whether people passing through borders may be involved in terrorism, and is frequently used to gather intelligence and disrupt suspected plots.

Pete Weatherby QC, representing some of the bereaved families, said a “port stop” could have revealed Abedi’s plans and led police to the car he had used to store bomb components.

Salman Abedi in CCTV footage from Victoria Station before the bombing

The inquiry heard that there had been an emerging “cumulative picture” as Abedi, several family members and associates cropped up numerous times in intelligence gathered by police and the security services.

Ramadan Abedi, the bomber's father, was subjected to two port stops under terror laws in 2011, while his young son was with him, and he had reported links to banned extremist organisation the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group.

Two years later, in December 2013, Abedi was first investigated due to an association with a “subject of interest” (SOI) of MI5, and was himself made an SOI in March 2014.

In July 2014, the probe was closed and he was deemed a “low” residual threat.

A month later, Abedi and his younger brother and fellow plotter, Hashem, were rescued by HMS Enterprise as both were British nationals evacuated from war-torn Libya.

The would-be terrorist went on to be in contact with eight SOIs, discovered during intelligence gathering on other suspect individuals, the inquiry has heard.

His older brother, Ismail, was found to have “utterly abhorrent” Isis propaganda on his phone during a port stop and Abedi visited a jailed terrorist in prison twice.

The area of Manchester in which he lived had been identified in a report by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre as having a potential issue with young men at risk of radicalisation.

MI5 did not attempt to refer Abedi to the Prevent counter-extremism scheme at any stage despite his proximity to suspected Isis supporters, the inquiry heard.

Det Ch Scally will continue to give evidence on Thursday.

Additional reporting by PA

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Please enter a valid email
Please enter a valid email
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number
Please enter your first name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
Please enter your last name
Special characters aren’t allowed
Please enter a name between 1 and 40 characters
You must be over 18 years old to register
You must be over 18 years old to register
Opt-out-policy
You can opt-out at any time by signing in to your account to manage your preferences. Each email has a link to unsubscribe.

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in