Ofsted social work inspections ‘outdated’, says report
The report condemns entire departments where only a handful of failings are found
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Government inspections of social workers working with children push failing teams further into decline and placed vulnerable children at risk because they spark a spiral of counterproductive reforms, according to a damning review to be published this week.
The critical report will say the Ofsted inspection regime, designed to check that children’s services are fit for purpose, is “outdated”, “one-dimensional” and condemns entire departments where only a handful of failings are found.
The report, to be published by consultancy Impower, claims that the effect of judging a whole department with a single word – “inadequate” – sets off a chain of events that makes the service much worse: the loss of senior leaders (who are often sacked), high staff turnover, reliance on temporary agency staff, higher numbers of referrals and unsustainable workloads for social workers. These factors lead to the ”most acute form of failure”.
Authored by local government expert Amanda Kelly, the study will say: “From our analysis the impact of an negative inspection serves the complete opposite purpose of protecting children. A quick glance at councils recently found to be inadequate demonstrates some stark impacts following the one-word judgment given. These include an increase in work volumes of up to 50 per cent (in already overwhelmed organisations), a significant reduction in timeliness of intervention leaving children more unsafe, and a surge in staff turnover with the resultant use of an ever more transient and costly agency workforce.”
The stark conclusion echoes concerns raised by local government chiefs.Last year, Doncaster council’s Jo Miller wrote: “Rubbish councils are subject to ... vilification in the media and the demoralisation and exit of hard-to-recruit social workers. How does this drive improvement?”
An Ofsted spokesperson responded: “We make no apology for carrying out robust inspections of local authority services. Ofsted recognises the constraints within which social workers and their managers work, as our recent social care annual report acknowledged.”
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments