Peterborough named the ‘worst place to be without a car in UK’

This new city, designated in 1967, could have been built with public transport at its heart

The town’s public transport is criticised
The town’s public transport is criticised

It has excellent rail links to major cities, and is the location for the headquarters of Thomas Cook, the world’s best-known name in travel.

But the hapless traveller who steps from a train in Peterborough will find their transport problems just beginning.

Peterborough is named and shamed today as the worst place in Britain to be without a car. It is at the foot of the table in the Campaign for Better Transport’s 2014 Car Dependency Scorecard, which examines provision for pedestrians, cyclists and public-transport users in 29 British towns and cities.

The best three are big cities London, Manchester and Liverpool. But in a damning verdict on 20th-century town planners, the worst are two communities which expanded quickly during the 1960s and 1970s, plus Milton Keynes.

This new city, designated in 1967, could have been built with public transport at its heart. Instead, it comes last in many of the survey’s rankings. Researchers found that “reliance on cars [there] is the highest of all the cities”.

Besides Peterborough, the report singles out Colchester as a town that makes it very difficult for residents wanting to reach work or the town centre on foot or by public transport.

“While the historic centre is densely packed and walkable, more-recent development has been spread more sparsely around the edges of the city,” the researchers conclude.

But the greatest vitriol is reserved for Peterborough, where post-1960s population growth was not accompanied by decent public transport.

Mark Speed of Peterborough City Council, rejected the criticism, adding: “Our local bus routes are thriving, with an additional 400,000 journeys taken last year.”

But he conceded: ”Peterborough was built at a time when car was seen as the most-desirable mode of transport.”

English towns and cities ranked by how easy it is to live there without a car – with the least car-dependent locations at the top of the table:

How they ranked

1. London

2. Manchester

3. Liverpool

4. Brighton & Hove

5. Newcastle upon Tyne

6. Cambridge

7. Bristol

8. Birmingham

9. Southampton

10. Nottingham

11. Leicester

12. Stockport

13. Norwich

14. Luton

15. Sheffield

16. Plymouth

17. Leeds

18. Sunderland

19. Coventry

20. Gateshead

21. Northampton

22. Dudley

23. Derby

24. Bradford

25. Wigan

26. Swindon

27. Milton Keynes

28. Colchester

29. Peterborough

Campaign for Better Transport. Locations rated under accessibility, buses/trains, cycling/walking, car use.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

View comments