Plymouth shooter Jake Davison had gun confiscated over attack on youths in park

Officers returned troubled man’s weapon ‘after review by Devon and Cornwall Police’s firearms department’

Sam Hancock
Friday 20 August 2021 19:30
Comments
<p>The IOPC is investigating police decision-making over Davison’s possession of a shotgun and its licence </p>

The IOPC is investigating police decision-making over Davison’s possession of a shotgun and its licence

An investigation into the decision to return a gun to the Plymouth gunman, weeks before he shot and killed five people, has found his firearm was initially seized after he assaulted two teenagers in a park.

The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) said Devon and Cornwall Police took away Jake Davison’s weapon and its licence in December before returning it to him in July.

Having applied for a shotgun certificate in July 2017, Davison was issued the licence in January 2018. He legally purchased a gun two months later, the police watchdog said.

However, in September last year, an allegation of assault on two young people was made and Davison was identified as the suspect. When interviewed, he admitted his involvement, leading officers to seize his gun and certificate on 7 December.

Following Davison’s completion of the police “Pathfinder” scheme – a deferred caution and charge programme outside the criminal justice process – in March, the shotgun and certificate were returned after “a review by Devon and Cornwall’s Firearms Licensing Department”.

Announcing the update, IOPC’s regional director David Ford said he appreciated the “significant public concern that has arisen [from the case], and the need for answers to a range of questions for the safety of the public [as well as] to understand what happened leading up to the tragedy”.

“I can assure people our investigation will be thorough and any lessons arising will be shared as quickly as possible with Devon and Cornwall Police and wider bodies as necessary,” he added.

The watchdog’s investigation is focusing on what police actions were taken and when, the rationale behind police decision-making and whether relevant law, policy and procedures were followed concerning Davison’s possession of a shotgun.

“We are also examining any sharing of information between the part of the force aware Davison had been identified as a suspect for assault and the relevant department responsible for firearms licensing,” its statement on Friday said.

The probe will consider what background and suitability checks were made by the police, including from open source material, and whether the force had any information, from Davison’s GP and any other medical or mental health services he may have engaged with concerning his state of mind.

Mr Ford stressed that Devon and Cornwall police had “co-operated fully with our enquiries”, noting the force provided “relevant documentation” and the necessary information to assist with the investigation.

It emerged on Wednesday that Davison, 22, received mental health support before he killed his own mother, four other victims and himself in one of the UK’s deadliest mass shootings.

Davison, whose social media usage suggests he was obsessed with the misogynistic “incel” movement, had been in contact with a telephone helpline in Plymouth run by the independent Livewell Southwest organisation during the past 18 months, the group said.

That the gunman accessed this service during lockdown raises further questions around why he was granted a shotgun certificate.

Campaigners and politicians, as well as the friends of families of Davison’s victims, have called for answers as to why he was given the licence in 2018 and why he was not subjected to a full mental health assessment either then or when the weapon was seized.

While the IOPC continues with its investigation, the government has requested that all English and Welsh forces review their firearms application processes.

Register for free to continue reading

Registration is a free and easy way to support our truly independent journalism

By registering, you will also enjoy limited access to Premium articles, exclusive newsletters, commenting, and virtual events with our leading journalists

Already have an account? sign in

By clicking ‘Register’ you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use, Cookie policy and Privacy notice.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy policy and Terms of service apply.

Join our new commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in